This candidate chosen by vox For the Generalitat for the May elections has a belief in something that will be accepted today sexist violent crime against ex-wife. Carlos Flores Juberías, professor of Constitutional Law at the University of Valencia, Convicted by the final decision of the Valencian Provincial Court in 2002 for “customary crimes of psychic violence and 21 crimes of coercion, defamation and harassment” against his ex-wife and mother of their children according to the judicial decision, it caused a “psychological breakdown”.
Sentenced by the Fifth Division of the Valencian County Court in September 2002 dismisses the appeal submitted by the University of Valencia Law Professor and upheld a one-year prison sentence Valencia Criminal Court No. 7 has already decided ex-wife domestic violenceDivorced in 1999.
This court ruling confirms the “psychic violence” that Flores inflicted on his ex-wife. In addition to a one-year prison sentence, the court ruled that he would be barred from being elected by passive voting rights for one year.According to the news of Levante, a newspaper owned by Prensa Ibérica, a three-year ban on approaching his ex-wife and civil liability compensation of 6,000 euros. INFORMATIONIn the October 5, 2002 edition, under the title: “Court sentences a university professor to one year in prison for domestic violence”.
He told his ex-wife before their kids, “I’m going to fuck you for the rest of your life and I’m done with you.”
On the 22nd, Vox’s Spanish leadership appointed Flores Juberías as the party’s candidate for the Generalitat Valenciana. His name was mentioned several times with that of Santiago Abascal, as he was a prominent lawyer in Conservative circles for the 2023 election. In fact, he was selected by the PP in 2015 to occupy a position at Consell de Transparencia, which he still holds due to non-renewal of this body. The candidate this newspaper contacted yesterday refused to testify, leaving any action to the legal services of the formation.
“The Kidnapper”
Regarding the sentence, the courts considered it proven that Flores Juberías persecuted her ex-wife up to 21 times after her divorce, both at home, at the children’s school and on the street, hurling insults, harassment and threats. The sentence documents that the defendant went out to the street of his ex-wife’s house seven times in a month and a half and shouted to her husband from under her balcony with the words “thief, kidnapper, dungeon owner, prostitute”.
The law professor claimed that the victim harbored “hostility” because he had another relationship.
According to the facts disclosed in the court’s judgment, Flores said to his ex-wife at the door of the training center, “I will fuck you for the rest of your life and finish you off, thief.” , the woman “had to leave, accompanied by a lady, ten minutes after the defendant’s persistent presence at the crime scene.” As a matter of fact, it is stated in the sentence that once the eldest daughter had to ask for help from two policemen due to the insults of her father. Insults against the children’s grandparents and the accused’s ex-father-in-law were also noted.
All these, according to the forensic psychiatry report prepared before the first hearing, caused the woman to experience “a psychological breakdown” with “fear of her ex-husband, low self-esteem” and “anxiety”. problems and insomnia”, he was also forced to go to Barcelona with his family.
After the first sentence, the accused applied to the Provincial Court on the grounds that the children were not questioned and the victim “provoked him and harbored hostility towards his new relationship” and “lost his status as a woman”. University professor”. However, the court, considering that there was sufficient evidence and witnesses to prosecute, found it right that the mother objected to the interrogation of minors and upheld the previous sentence.
She asked not to be prosecuted for domestic violence
Flores Juberías was convicted when Article 153 of the Penal Code was applied, which punishes “those who inflict physical or psychological violence against whoever their spouse is or has been”. The Gender-Based Violence Act was due two years later, in 2004, so the resolution refers to “domestic violence”.
However, the Constitutional Law professor argued that the facts do not belong to the crime of domestic violence, as there was no “injury”. To this, the chamber replied that the protected legal right is in fact “embodied in the protection of the dignity of the person in the family, the right of all members not to be subjected to inhuman, degrading or degrading treatment.”