Yolanda Díaz has tried to worry major delivery companies about the problem of thousands of families filling their shopping carts, enough food in the pantry, healthy food in the fridge for them and their children. Communist concerns. I don’t want to be distracted by Yolanda Díaz or her suggestions, instead focus your attention on the answers. Many academic and institutional responses have ruled that freedom stands between mouth and mouth. She is bad. If the rising prices were between hunger and food, the problem would be solved with money. But when it is not possible to pay, there is nothing to be done because it would not be the hunger of the poor that was at issue, but the freedom of the market. When the answer is freedom, the questions are over.
European law advocates the freedom of rice so that it does not reach the teeth of the poor, except for the money that costs money when purchased at a price determined by the market. The hungry, the government, the volunteers of the food banks, and the cooking nuns fix themselves and this freedom moves on. This is jurisdiction, not eggs. Who doesn’t have money, fry a jurisdiction. When you have a lot of money, you will eat eggs. This is how it should be said, and thus: bread, bread.
The balance sheets of distribution giants are among the good news of the year. On the day of its publication, the protests of the national sphere, overwhelmed by low margins, high costs and risks, were forgotten. There is no greater problem when freedom is the best solution. With the excellent professionals he hired to book the market, he never calculated his deaths from speculation like those who came without planning. Like fortunes counted in billions, they counted in millions. The market only answers questions that come to it from freedom.
– Dad, I’m hungry.
Yes, but you have freedom. To bed and happy dreams.