At this point in time, you will have already read and heard dozens of opinions about it. ‘unexpected’ (sic) family transfer List of portfolios in the fascinating and cinematographic British monarchy. Of all, I hope you didn’t particularly miss one in which, when asked what the new monarch’s reign would be like, someone scolded him at a meeting as “shorter than his mother’s.” Bright. I loved. It’s obvious, but you won’t tell me after you listen and it didn’t cross your mind at that moment, Image of Charles of England At the age of 143, who can finally recover after waiting half a life and fully enjoy the power honeys by 2095.
Whatever happens, and as is often said, as all analysts predict, the change of protagonists will undoubtedly affect the plot of the story. regional instability and increased independence in Scotland and Wales; a galloping economic crisis; A disconnect with Europe that leaves it at the mercy of American philanthropy, and above all, an ordinary society – now without the eternal mother – to be seen if it is willing. supporting a very contradictory structure or institution with times when we live like a monarchy.
We have known for a long time that as a result of the numerous scandals of all kinds that have characterized its members, the British Royal House has been called Firm, Corporation, also known as Monarchy PLC. In general, the magazine forbes He calculates a fortune of 27,750 million euros for this firm in jewellery, investments, works of art, the district, nature parks and various palaces such as Balmoral, where the queen died. Eye, 27.750 million euros. Apart from these and all of the above, Queen Elizabeth II. Elizabeth dies with a personal estate of 500 million, 70 of which she has already inherited from her mother. More luck than luck, it seems from afar. In addition, it is worth noting that British taxpayers set aside 98m euros annually for the representation of members of the monarchy and the maintenance of Buckingham Palace, in a fee known as the Sovereign Grant.
As a company that knows its future is only in its image, they invest a lot of money in it and of course they do it very well. And what they couldn’t do with propaganda, they do with a great show, even if it takes away the shameQueen She manages to make the image of Elizabeth especially popular with the new generation, paying little attention to what they consider little more than an old English woman with a bag always done and hanging her hair.
The question that arises now is to know to what extent the English – and the Spaniards as well – They will continue to support the company as an element of stability and a world-famous icon, or they will decide to completely customize a monarchy that has functioned as a profitable business for centuries, to the great joy of its ‘royal’. ‘ shareholders. The question that arises is also to know whether the British – and the Spaniards – believed they could organize, protect, manage and take care of themselves all the lands and state property now inherited by the Crown. now he is outsourcing a family to take care of him for a huge profit. The question for the British and Spaniards is to explain if you earn more by keeping a build power like monarchy rather than suppressing it; if the economic accounts are sufficiently transparent as they should be; there are families that deserve more, live better than others, and hold power by carrying a certain surname; If that’s debatable in a 21st century democracy, and more importantly, if they can be prosecuted like other mortals for wrongdoing. That’s the question.