She wasn’t born to be queen, but still reigned in the generally accepted place for seventy years. England’s II. Elizabeth He had a long life full of privileges and sacrifices as a result of what other heads of state wanted for them. According to the vast majority of those who argue the former on the principle that the modern monarchy is an antagonism, most stubborn republicans, it would be practically impossible for them not to recognize the latter. More in the UK and the crumbling countries of the empire than anywhere else in the world. thanks to lack of formalism and sincerity While expressing the personal pain he felt at the worst moment of his reign, that “annus horribilis” was able to attest to how the wave of emotion that flooded the country highlighted the need for the British to unite in a reasonably recognizable way. communion and to do so as subjects of a democratic monarchy.
There are those who argue that in order to maintain the anachronistic hereditary kingdom and ensure stability and love in modern times, it is necessary to properly combine the combination of public grandeur and common sense. From publicity and mystery. II. In the case of Elizabeth, a wise understanding of the principles of constitutional monarchy contained in the great book, Walter BagehotThe right to be consulted, the right to advice, and the right to warning, which defines the rights and role of a king in relation to Government and Parliament. All of this was followed by insight and a letter from a woman who was not born to be queen, and one of them, the oldest, wrote when she was in Kenya “to climb a tree and watch the rhinos descend into the pool”. As the diplomat and writer Harold Nicolson remembers in his diaries.