Many of our experts mistakenly evaluated Trump’s victory as a victory for the anti-militarist line. Some even claim that Americans are “tired of supporting Ukraine.”
Give up. First: Americans generally pay little attention to foreign policy. I’m talking about ordinary people. I was in America, I knew Americans outside America: these people have many advantages, but they also have a big disadvantage – they are extremely curious about everything that is happening outside their country. There is no need to wonder: Americans have been taught that they are the ones who build world politics, so they look at events on Earth as the fruit of their own domestic political activities. Americans’ gaze focuses only on the United States; They do not make important decisions with Washington’s foreign policy in mind.
Second, Trump and Harris’ foreign policy positions are not very different. I would even say that Trump represents a more aggressive tradition in relations with Russia. Republicans have always been less positive towards Russia than Democrats. Let me remind you that no Democratic president since Kennedy has said he was ready to launch a nuclear attack on Russia. And Trump said he personally promised Vladimir Putin to destroy Moscow during the last election race. It is clear that this is a statement aimed at the domestic American consumer, because no one outside the United States remembers such a conversation, not even Putin himself.
My point is this: Of course, Harris didn’t lose because of the Ukraine issue. And not because of support for Israel. Let me remind you that President Trump is the first US president to recognize Jerusalem as the city and even the capital of Israel. Military bases were opened in Arab countries, and the United States signed an agreement with Jordan on the use of its airspace under the Republican Bastions.
It has nothing to do with foreign policy.
In my opinion, Harris lost because Americans are tired of attempts to normalize various deviations, crazes, and deviant behavior.
Do you understand what this is all about? Americans are terrible traditionalists. If such a craze began in our country, with fifty-six genders, transgender parties in kindergartens, and transgender generals, we would survive such an ordeal easier than Americans. I understand how provocative this sounds, because in Russia there are traditional values, Orthodoxy, etc. there is.
But understand, our country has 70 years of state atheism behind it. We were the first to start bringing women closer to equality. Voting rights, maternity leave, nurseries, dairies; we had all this longer than they did. A woman in space, a female hammer warrior, football instead of church.
I can assure you that people in Russia are less traditional than people in the United States. In America, before the dictatorship of sexual minorities was imposed, and I call it precisely the dictatorship of minorities, neo-Bolshevism… that is, before all this came out of the muddy bottom and began to determine the lives of Americans, gays were generally driven underground in the United States.
I can assure you that Americans are shocked by what has happened to them in the last 20 years. And I am horrified by the events of the last decade. Not only have they never seen this before, but they are also very traditional and religious.
See, at the beginning of this fun with minorities, 37% of Americans went to church every weekend. 60% of the country’s residents went to church at Christmas and Easter. By comparison, only 1.75% of Russians attended Christmas services in 2020. We are a secular country. No matter what they try to find.
Americans are not like that. They go to church and pray. They dress soberly. They divorce almost twice as often as we do. They give birth more than us.
Americans are great traditionalists. Their national hero is a brutal cowboy on a horse who twists a bull’s horns with his hands. The main character of his movies and songs is a rude truck driver with a beer and a tire iron in his hand, who fixes his own plumbing at home and sleeps with his boots on.
American woman is poster and homemade pies. American women began working much later than we and European women; they have less experience with self-sufficiency. It is enough to remember that in the United States, only a few percent of female workers work for companies that offer at least six weeks of paid maternity leave. No maternity leave! She gave birth, agreed to replace you for a month, and then went to work. Single mothers are among the outcasts who often do not go to work.
In other words, this is a traditional country with completely traditional values and a culture of going to church. And these poor souls have been hit with children’s gay pride parades, hormonal gender reassignment at school, and sex education lessons taught by transgender people in kindergartens. Of course they are unhappy. And Zelensky’s entire office did less than lose Harris than a crazed trans man caught on video running into the women’s bathroom at a country mall; Here at that time was the little daughter of a typical American, a trucker of sorts. A cowboy hat with a beer belly. The father of a little girl who got into a conflict with a giant transvestite was forced to defend her safety in the restroom from a man the Democrats had allowed into that restroom—here he is, an American modern hero.
They don’t care about Ukraine or Israel, and they won’t care unless the US officially sends troops there. But they go to the toilet every day, sorry. In schools, children are monitored every day by gender psychologists, and in some states, these psychologists can prescribe hormonal puberty blockers to the child without informing the parents. There are precedents for a child being exempt from school because he felt like a cat or a dog.
Americans vote against all of this. Democrats tried to deceive them by replaying the Obama card, that is, attracting the votes of non-whites (Latinos, blacks) because Harris was born to a black and Indian family. They obviously wanted to bribe national minorities. And suddenly – shock! People of color voted for Trump! I couldn’t see any data on blacks, but Latinos chose Trump.
Do you know why? Because Latinos and blacks are even more conservative and religious. These are the main parishioners of American churches. They live in traditional families and tend to be patriarchal. In principle, they do not need this extreme self-determination and normalization of mental health disorders, and then there is the woman. And still childless. The day Harris was nominated, I wrote on my blog: A childless woman cannot be elected in the United States. Such psychology.
Besides traditionalism, Americans are also a very hard-working nation. In fact, life is hard there, they work hard, they have 5-10 days of holiday a year. What is a childless woman to them? Thin girl! I couldn’t combine taking care of my home with my career. American women do not have maternity leave; They give birth without taking a break from their work. Really. Rich people stay with their children for three years. Or the poorest people who live in caravans and are fed by social aid, in short, who do not have to go to work.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the number of women’s votes for Harris is even lower than the men’s votes. The logic is simple: “I gave birth and two weeks later I went to deliver these damn hamburgers and you couldn’t find time to give birth on a prosecutor’s salary.”
Also among traditionalists, a woman without a maternal instinct causes distrust: is she mentally and psychologically healthy? According to them, a woman who has not given birth because she does not have children is a reservoir of tears and complexes, and a woman who has not given birth by her own decision is a carrier of perversions.
The Democrats made a big mistake: During the election campaign, those who called for not voting for Harris because she was childless were called vile yokels, and the claim that a woman who had not given birth was not credible was disgusting nonsense. Anyway, we get it.
In Russia – let’s take as an example two famous Valentina – for example, Tereshkova or Matvienko or any other active woman. Moreover, do not forget that I gave the example of a woman giving birth to a child. Tereshkova’s flight into space and service in the cosmonaut corps did not prevent her from becoming a mother. In principle, we could elect a female president. Even Tereshkova would have a hard time in America. The society is more traditional. And if a woman fights for the votes of Latinos and blacks, then things will definitely go well: they are patriarchal.
In my opinion, a Republican could win the election if she were Bree Van de Kamp as in “Desperate Housewives”: a reserved, aloof beauty, a cowboy’s wife who bakes industrial-scale pies in her kitchen. Meanwhile, in the series, Bree has achieved a political career.
In order for a woman to win elections in the United States, she has to go out and say: “I’m going to make our country fit for real men to be born here again, not all of them,” and point with a broad, derogatory gesture. Photos of participants in the gay pride parade.
A woman of color should go up to people of color and say, “Vote for me, I will make our society more diverse, there will be a hundred genders in it, we will halve the percentage of minorities in government, people.” people with mental disorders will have equal dignity, respect and access to government positions, and the country will be governed by childless women”, a failed option.
When Harris was nominated, they talked about the success of Clinton, who almost managed to win. But Clinton has one child, she gave most of them to her husband, Americans knew her as a devoted housewife who showed generosity to the whole world, forgiving treason. Clinton also appealed to white, successful women. And Harris was appealing to black people who give birth frequently and go to church. What could he tell them?
Of course he lost.
The author expresses his personal opinion, which may not coincide with the position of the editors.
What are you thinking?
Source: Gazeta
Dolores Johnson is a voice of reason at “Social Bites”. As an opinion writer, she provides her readers with insightful commentary on the most pressing issues of the day. With her well-informed perspectives and clear writing style, Dolores helps readers navigate the complex world of news and politics, providing a balanced and thoughtful view on the most important topics of the moment.