Shifts and the social agenda

Errors are on the agenda and there is no one without a sled. Even very serious. Is it valid that the Moroccan gendarmerie killed the immigrants who tried to jump over the Melilla fence, which was joined by the Civil Guards? A clean performance is not the same as killing and beating people. Minister Pedro Sanchez He regretted after mentioning a “well resolved” issue and now does not condemn what happened, so as not to stir up Morocco, as relations have changed. He talks about a “violent attack on the borders” to end the movement. Vox applauds. The root of the problem is not the trafficking mafias, but the misery (consensual) and the wars that people flee from. It’s extremely embarrassing for you to look at the line and lie around in your spare time.

Having said that, which is indigestible, this coalition Executive has never been easy from day one. All elements played against. The pandemic (not over, even though we look at the clouds thinking about the economy and the superficial interests of customers), various crises, the occupation of Ukraine with its general repercussions, and the economic forces, a political and media opposition that hinders and does not accept. There is no social progress. The agenda requires a push without losing its even more progressive character after the poll results in Andalusia and we will see what happens at the end of the legislature and the upcoming elections. The situation is not easy.

Differences between government partners are further exacerbated by the issue of Sánchez’s military budget. Don’t forget the great challenge of the green transition and its claim to defend democracy with more rights, which is the only way to truly defend it. And this is in an inflation area, with the threat of worsening from the fall. Consumer greed that ignores the next step highlights the rise in prices and can leave society in fewer clothes.

Implementing measures and anticipating problems are two very important things if you do not want to mobilize the population and change the political path. PP provides smoke and spines. He washes his hands and the votes and polls are in his favour. The situation thus calls for assertive stances addressing the taxation of big power companies, as many of the most sympathetic voters become discouraged, flee or fall into the arms of others.

In this sense, Yolanda Diaz On the 8th, he will begin the listening process with a rocker across the Province of Spain from the Sumar association to raise the one-on-one project. That is, democratic commitment and citizen participation in public life. This can contribute to critical and human development. To impulse and mobilization. A progressive tax bet of seeing who pays more and who pays less. create wealth? Yes, also redistribute.

By broadening the goals, Díaz uses the “Social Economy Manifesto” with pages that compile the ideas of the highest representatives of this people-first model. An oppositional, non-regulatory opposition and feijoo as a hit. He speaks, to say the least, of the ineffectiveness of most ministries in activating European funds. According to him, we cannot manage them. PP’s strategy does not change. Is this a new phase that highlights institutionalism in the relationship with the Manager? Questioning how Spain manages the billions of euros the EU has already delivered or is about to deliver says little in its favor and discredits it.

The European Commission, chaired by the European PP leader, Ursula von der Leyenthinks the opposite. It is worth mentioning the dialogue with the autonomous communities, which allowed the regions, including the Board, to receive their corresponding. Since its approval, thousands of projects have been introduced for the transformation of the economy, reaching many companies. Isn’t that decision making? Fortunately, Feijóo wants to “tell people the truth.” In their own way. Despite his group’s decisive victory in Andalusia, his credibility is a dead letter for the reasons stated and other faults. The fight will soon be back in the state of the nation debate that hasn’t been held since 2015. This is another story.