What, hasn’t this happened before? Born, lived and died, not knowing that you can watch live in real time how someone’s dignity is tarnished? And not in retelling and quoting … I don’t know if the Metoo movement will die from now on. But the kind of embarrassment will develop in court. Very exciting. Only the last episode of the epic movie was watched live by three million people.
A serious uncle appears in the frame with a terrible Scottish accent. Even to the Russian ear, this accent sounds very funny – remember the famous dialogue between two Scots with a talking elevator, ylevn, ylevn, (floor adynytsat) – and even with its seriousness and profession … And by profession he is Johnny Depp’s security guard.
Is it true that Depp urinated in the hallway, saying, “Yes, sir, I would have remembered if Johnny Depp had seen the rooster,” the guard said to lawyer Amber Heard’s equally serious question. You saw his dick.
– No, I did not.
– I object.
“I would remember if I saw it.
And everything else is in the same vein. The absurdity of the questions, the secrecy of the subject, and the combination of the court’s trademark seriousness and rigor, and Depp and Heard’s negative charisma, Depp’s perpetual question joke creates this new genre.
In the frame, an uncle with a neat gray beard of no age, they say, decides the outcome of the case. This is Depp’s old friend, internationally unknown artist Isaac Baruch. He is Depp’s keeper, who long ago gave him his apartment in the center of the earth. Isaac’s sincerity sank into the spirit of the jury, he burst into tears, describing what a bad Mrs. Heard and what a good Mr. Depp. He tried to make jokes wherever possible.
– Did Mr. Depp ever call Ms. Heard… (a very bad word)?
“I object, Your Honor.
– Can you answer?
– Well, that’s what he always calls me … (a very bad word).
When a man calls a man this word with the letter “k” or (in Russian) the letter “p”, it has a surprisingly funny effect. They say that once a general from the English nobility uttered this word in front of the entire formation, because a conscripted soldier stupidly drowned an entire tank in the river. He drew the soldier forward, and in the midst of the ringing, as they said, silence in front of the entire formation, he said clearly and loudly: Kant! And that’s it. This completed the exercise report. And you need to understand the power of this word to feel how it interacts with the rank of general. Especially if the interlocutor is a man.
– Yes, he calls me Kant regularly, so I can’t remember if he called him Kant, I can guess.
And now it could be a victory for feminists (how to call a woman Kant!) – she began to joke.
Oh, Apollo, oh, Apollo!
– I’m not asking you where I got the painting. I’m asking, do you have a corkscrew? (somehow very similar in tone and substance).
It should be noted that this is the abuser’s first victory in court. Before that, there were only massacres. And biased. Completely ruined careers on a single charge. It was enough to shout: You are a gender chauvinist, a molester! – that’s it, you’re done, it’s hard to protect yourself from this. Blame was equal to punishment.
And then suddenly. A man (allegedly) beats a woman, sues, wins a defamation case in court. Now he owes him 11 million that he doesn’t have. Its reputation (already ruined) has been restored. His was destroyed. Whites (men) start and win.
This is a serious precedent. We misogynists rejoice. Our enemies, feminists, gays, lesbians, are baffled.
“The trial has turned into a public realm of misogyny,” writes The Guardian columnist. – The victim of nominally hurtful comments is Heard, but it’s hard to shake off the feeling that they’re actually aimed at all women. We are in a moment of violent anti-feminist backlash and modest gains are disappearing. This will have a devastating effect on the survivors, who will now have to remain silent in the sting of an expensive defamation lawsuit. Women’s speech has become much less free.”
After the Depp-Heard process, many tried to bury the metoo movement – ahead of its time, of course.
Let’s not troll the columnist even if we wanted to. It’s easy to troll feminists. They lack humor… This is the most serious movement in the history of human rights movements. In general, human rights activists are holy people and lack humor, just like Kharmsovsky Dostoevsky is the most bleak audience. There are also ladies…
I recently stumbled upon a part of a sermon conference where the Alexander Men were discussing whether Jesus was laughing, smiling and saying yes, he was always joking. It was very important to him that Christianity did not take such serious seriousness.
Laughing, they rise to Almighty Allah.
The road to hell is paved with tomb cabbage soup.
Not that I don’t sympathize with feminists and the metoo movement (especially because I am), but I sympathize with all victims, just as Professor Preobrazhensky sympathizes with Germany’s children, and the professor and I are not upset. for this holy cause of fifty dollars. thinking.
But the real question is, they were all the same.
Metoo is a powerful way to discredit and suppress the formerly dominant old elite (white men), a way to purge the traditional elite. It always works perfectly. It was a kind of common denominator for a common globalizing agenda.
Maybe the metoo has dropped and an anti-feminist backlash has started. It’s possible. In general, women won in court long before modern radical feminism came into existence. Professor Martin Van Creveld has been talking about this for a long time, and this issue of gender inequality in court is justified by him on an academic level. The court traditionally favors the woman.
So the previous situation is interesting.
Or maybe they’re exaggerating: and it’s the witty, deceitful, hysterical, pity-worthy special case that the devilishly glamorous ironic Hollywood star wins over this painted bitch.
Hard to say, you have to watch it.
The first thought that comes to mind… Depp’s victory in the middle of Metoo would be unlikely… And in today’s world, which is successfully flying to hell, the meeting’s agenda is no longer relevant, to say the least. recent events, not until mitu.
The author expresses his personal opinion, which may not coincide with the editors’ position.