Le Corbusier described houses as “machines for living” and was accused of making a strict definition. This mechanical state sounds like a romantic request, now that it’s not for living inside houses but for feeding a family. real estate roulette one who relentlessly sacrifices those who live in a speculative spiral. pressure on tenants and it’s hard to reconcile applicants for a house with an empty image of Spain, the popular fetish of social gatherings where you don’t know what to talk about. This reality was replaced by Spain, with which he became “the market, his friend”, which was evacuated, overpopulated, and sought to evict its traditional inhabitants in favor of the wealthier bourgeoisie in other countries.
The continuity of the myth of the two Spains under a new format, large real estate funds, vultures gladly pay for the evacuation of coastal inhabitants, as they sin in excess. We are not talking here of the Uighurs in Ukraine or the Chinese-style mass deportations with Russia, but of friendly evacuation after considerable compensation. Later, expatriates would be replaced by wealthy immigration from other countries.
There is demand, the job is guaranteed. Unfortunately, the evacuation of residents is carried out in reckless brutality, allegedly going unnoticed by their victims. In the midst of this great upheaval as the rich evacuated the less fortunate, the ruler, characterized by his audacity bordering on recklessness, disembarked. To those who accuse the PSOE of arriving half a century late Housing Law, should be translated as “Pedro Sánchez is the first to dare in decades”. Even if it’s half way and with a lot of warning.
As usual, self-proclaimed constitutionalist parties accuse Sánchez of acting behind a one-sided interpretation of the economy supported by the right. receive a grant. The accusation requires a textual quotation of Article 47 of the Magna Carta, which was circulated in three strokes. At the beginning it is emphasized that “all Spaniards have the right to decent and adequate housing” and teachers here with their own or inherited homes remember that this is not a fundamental priority, for God’s sake go.
If “having the right” appeals only to the uncompromising desire for prosperity, the second punch from the high legislators that underpins the first statement is surprising. “Public forces will create the necessary conditions and create the relevant rules for this right to become effective.” The deliberate allusion puts academics to shame. At least he defends state intervention to the point of deeming it necessary. If there is no home for all, the “public powers” must take action, unless that hierarchical concept excludes the Government, when the right does not have evidence that warrants further discussion.
And the best is yet to come, for article 47, sent as an irreconcilable statement of intent, ends with a manifesto that today looks Marxist-Leninist. “Public authorities” should facilitate access to housing by “regulating”. land use in accordance with the general interest to avoid speculation. That is, the opposite of Aznar’s stance by declaring all developable lands unless otherwise stated. The defense of the constitutionalist parties should be that they will in no way approve of a text with the content in question, a text that they would uproot like “nationalities”. From makeup to amputation.
The verb used against speculation is final. It’s not a question of stopping or mitigating, it’s a question of “prevention”. In other words, cancel when even Donald Trump doesn’t dare to declare it. Current housing situation in Spain discharge is excluded from the plague in question. There’s also no doubt that the resounding infinitive will not be included today by any party across the spectrum, from Vox to the PSOE, the same coalition that has prevented the 18 parliamentary proposals on the Royal Family from coming to fruition.
Comparing housing doesn’t deny Sánchez, either. Countries with little suspicion of Chavism, such as Switzerland, Austria, Germany, the United States (California and New York’s mansion tax), Canada, or Singapore have laws that make it easier for their citizens to reside. It remains only to determine the degree of citizenship.