Ideological instability is shaking the political map. Thus, a speech in France accusing his political rival of setting the country on fire resonates in a calm but determined tone. Is Macron calling out to Mélenchon? No, moderate Marine Le Pen accuses the radical French president of losing his way. The far-right leader may laughably declare to Der Spiegel that “people come to us who have never wanted to be seen with us before.” And he adds a dreamy saying after Pedro Sánchez had trouble falling asleep with Podemos. “Is there anything better than knowing the numbers in presidential nightmares? I can not think anything”.
When extremists become a viable option, the depiction of the situation outweighs the mapless exploration. Why do people vote for the far right who know it’s against their own interests? It is not a brand new subject, it has a tradition. Margaret Thatcher blessed Francis Bacon, as a “nasty, sick” painter this did not prevent the artist from systematically voting for the Tories. The explanation was linear, “simpler, no complications.” The left is very demanding. Likewise, the progressives of the world banded together to defend the nude photos of Robert Mapplethorpe that were defamed by Ronald Reagan’s presenters, while the depiction stubbornly voted for the Republicans.
It’s time for Feijóo’s turmoil with the unmanageable Vox to land in Spain, where Sánchez highlights from shock to shock his merits with Podemos. It is currently recommended that the PSOE, for basic survival reasons, rebuild the neighborhood lot that complements it. Otherwise, common power lost. In fact, it is easier to force a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine than the self-destruction of the micro-lefts. In the first, everyone is dying to win. In the latter, everyone is dying to lose, only defeat can justify them.
A confession by one party may clarify this examination. To date, I have not been able to decipher the identities, structures and aims of the most honorable formations to the left of the PSOE in the last Andalusian autonomous communities. I admit that I am the most inept translator, but I have written articles without the need to understand the divorces in question. It was easy to interpret the result in Andalusia after confessing to the impostor syndrome. The absolute majority of PP alone, with a candidate that stands out for its mediocrity and a significant Vox reserve. The opposite shore disappeared, but yes, it was loaded with reasons and ideological purity. He did it himself, here is the problem.
In terms of polls, and given that the very authentic left continues its unstoppable decline, the five percent guillotine in local and regional elections overshadows his hopes. It is a black hole where all the votes taken before reaching this result disappear, but here it is taken for granted that progressivism operates from an electoral perspective. In reality, the portside purge or liquidation of the PSOE is underway, as if the elections were a clumsy bourgeois spectacle interrupting the honorable work of left-wing fragmentation.
The far left does not theorize like no one else. As misfortunes hang above his continuum in power, he shatters all hypotheses. He ensured that no one could approach another without consulting Irene Montero first, or that contemporary Spain’s most talkative politician was named Pablo Iglesias, coincidentally being the minister’s partner and former deputy prime minister. It feeds off the nostalgia of the last decade, when the left has grown into an adult with invaluable help.
While the bird left is adamant that the end of the world will catch him lecturing, the majority of progressively oriented citizens desire to vote with the simplicity that Francis Bacon claims. Bertrand Russell’s great intellectual discovery is that he wants to choose executives that are slightly dumber than average to make it easier to control. He’s not in favor of magical leftism, except when he’s involved with García Márquez. It’s far from his soul to endure the predatory PP of a dreamy evangelical preacher, but no one should take the game lightly. Of these, Yolanda Díaz isn’t the best progressive option. She is still the only one, despite the risk of being reincarnated as Nadia Calviño, a hypothesis that cannot be ignored.