die in a dream

No time to read?
Get a summary

I hope the fiu of fireworks motion of reprimand falling anywhere did not prevent them from listening to the arpeggio of true democracy. The same Wednesday, with Vox’s disappointment in Congress, the Constitutional Court (TC) publicly dismissed his appeal to the euthanasia law, upholding it by nine votes to two—and just a day later Vox announced the rejection of his appeal and the full ratification of the Celáa law. The judges’ statement at the request of Santiago Abascal already anticipates the rejection of the request submitted by Núñez Feijóo’s Popular.

And it seems that even some conservative members of the Constitution do not seem to have declared the “Government death plan complete” in the euthanasia law passed in Spain in June 2021. placing the throwing and death industry». A “radical, eugenic and criminal” law; “A slippery slope of assisted suicide” as “a response to the pension system” that sees terminal illness as “an economic and social burden that must be eliminated”. The People’s Party also saw the law as a way out. “Problem maintaining PSOE” and “a way to save costs” by Head of Government Pedro Sánchez, “gentlemen of the PP: the only thing the euthanasia law will save is the suffering of thousands of people”.

But not only did the PP of ex-leader Pablo Casado not see thousands of people, he described euthanasia as “Spain doesn’t have this problem” and the PSOE as “an expert who removes problems that don’t exist”. to reopen wounds and split into Spaniards.”

In addition to challenging them, his successor Núñez Feijóo announced that he would repeal the Celaá law, the abortion law, the “only yes is yes” law, the trans law, the sedition law, and the Democratic law—if he ever came to power. memory and also this euthanasia law what he sees as an “attack on the right to life”

Vox went further in her appeal, arguing that “the fundamental right to life is absolute, it cannot be enjoyed, and the State must protect this right even against the will of its owner.”

And it is precisely this “will of the person” that the Constitutional appeals to, considering “the boundary separating the right to life in the context of euthanasia from the right to self-determination”. This Organic Law on the Regulation of Euthanasia established a rigorous administrative procedure with robust guarantees for the protection of these rights and assets. Pre-control is considered in the hands of health personnel who try to ensure that the decision is conscious, free and responsible. The Court argues that “such a configuration does not allow the right to life to be given an absolute value and does not impose on the State a duty of individual protection which implies a paradoxical duty to live”.

The right to life does not imply the paradoxical duty to live.

In the Dominican Republic there is a type of cocktail called the ‘Die dreaming’, which is made more or less weird depending on the cache of where it is served with orange juice, milk and a piece of cane sugar. It’s an unusually simple combination of ingredients among those of us who grew up believing it couldn’t be mixed because citrus curdled the milk. The origin of the name is poetic and evocative, but it actually has a lot in common with the word euthanasia. It comes from the Greek euthanasia, consisting of eu (good, good) and ‘thanatos’ (death), meaning: good death.

This you die well This has been confirmed in two different ways in a few months of law. First, because although the statistics are based on the countries where the application was made euthanasia Already widespread, they estimated figures of 1,000 to 1,500 assisted deaths per year. In Spain, in the first year of the law, only 180 procedures were recorded. These are data from the Right to Die With Honor association.

the second is coming National Organ Transplant Organization: Of these 180 people who decided to be euthanized, 44 of them donated their organs, saving the lives of 120 patients on the waiting list for organ transplants. Its director, Beatriz Domínguez-Gil, describes it as “a sublime act of generosity” because “after making a very difficult decision for themselves and their family circle, they make the bold and difficult decision to do it in hospital so that their loved ones’ organs can be saved, instead of dying at home.

I admire them and hug their families. And for PP and VOX, Advice: don’t give up the struggle to show the truth “Completion of the government’s plan to build the discard and death industry” and stop voting against investigations into residential deaths during the pandemic. Between March and April 2020 alone, 7,291 elderly people who were victims of the Ayuso Government Protocol died without medical attention.

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

April in Dance: Elche, Alicante and now Murcia

Next Article

RIA Novosti: Wagner fully controls the AZOM district in Artemovsk