Had Rebellion in the Constitutional been made as a soap opera, it would have been taken off the grid after a disastrous first season. Along the corridors, the platform’s programming director said, “Who cares about the Constitution, how did I let this stupid thing go down my throat. What’s the next thing they’ll suggest to me, Panic at the Royal Academy?” The architects of 23F would go on their shoulders today, and Tejero would now be lauded with his mustache for working the depraved muscles of the deputies and forcing them to throw themselves to the ground.
Another difference with the 23F is that new ones are guaranteed to be called by Congress. It is interesting that fans of postmodern coups do not notice the subtle harmony in this figure of Constitutional tricks to control what the cameras are talking about. This is a trap equivalent to affirming another unanimous transfer of rights, expressing itself on behalf of the whole of Spain, saying, “The Court has decided”, that it was five to six without unanimity. It would be more understandable to speak of a split Spaniard so that if you are born, one of the two TCs will freeze your heart.
It’s been a postmodern knee-jerk, but after it’s been confirmed that forced action won’t affect their existence, lawmakers and senators don’t seem overly concerned about meddling either. The carelessness reached the headline, where the erroneous “TC blocks” was replaced by the more precise “TC forbids”. The surrender of the cameras was prevented of their own accord, but of course the criminals are not Feijóo, but the judges, because the sublime designs of the Armada did not justify Tejero’s mamarrachada. Ignoring the insane is another way to beat them, the only excuse for the new normal is an aphorism.