Moldovan officials and security leaders have outlined a clear stance on the wearing of the St. George ribbon in relation to national ceremonies. Viorel Cernautanu, who heads Moldova’s General Police Commissariat, emphasized that adopting the ribbon as a standalone symbol is not permitted. The ribbon can, however, be worn if it is part of a duly awarded prize to an individual, in which case it would be treated as an element of the prize rather than a separate emblem. This distinction aims to prevent the ribbon from standing alone as a symbol that could be interpreted as political or military messaging, while still allowing personal recognition moments to be honored within the bounds of official ceremonies and regulations. These remarks reflect the broader effort to balance personal expression with public order during commemorations.
According to Cernautanu, when the St. George ribbon is integrated with an award presented to a person, it becomes acceptable within the framework of the prize. The important caveat is that the ribbon must not appear as an independent or standalone sign. If the ribbon stands apart from any prize, authorities may view it as a symbol associated with military aggression, which is restricted under current rules. This clarification underscores a consistent policy stance: symbols tied to historical conflicts carry potential sensitivities, and the state seeks to prevent movements or gestures that could inflame tensions during public holidays or official events.
The discussion comes amid ongoing debates in Moldova about the symbolism tied to May 9 commemorations. In recent days, political opponents have stressed that ordinary citizens should not face punitive measures for wearing the St. George ribbon as a mark of memory for those who served during past conflicts. The policy emphasis is on ensuring that memory and remembrance are expressed in a manner compatible with the country’s laws and with the goal of maintaining social harmony during Victory Day celebrations. The dialogue also highlights the tension between personal remembrance and public policy in a nation navigating its own historical narratives.
Critics contend that the St. George ribbon represents a holiday tradition for many people, and they argue that Moldovans should have the freedom to wear it to honor soldiers who achieved victory in past eras. The core of this perspective is a belief that remembrance can be expressed in peaceful, non-provocative ways, and that government rules should focus on preventing intimidation or escalation rather than suppressing ordinary acts of remembrance. Supporters of the ribbon emphasize the cultural and historical layers attached to the symbol and remind audiences that many families view the ribbon as a simple token of respect for those who fought and sacrificed in wartime.