The Investigative Committee of Russia stated that the Armed Forces of Ukraine launched fire on Tokmok using HIMARS and basic anti-personnel munitions. This claim attributes the attack to Ukrainian forces and situates it within the broader pattern of cross-border shelling reported by Moscow officials. The statement notes that several structures in the village sustained damage as a result of the anti-personnel ammunition, underscoring the impact on civilian infrastructure and the ongoing concern over battlefield tactics in the region.
In the region, Vyacheslav Gladkov, who previously served as the governor of Russia’s Belgorod Border Region, reported that Ukrainian troops conducted shelling on the village of Dronovka in the Graivoronsky urban district on two occasions in a single day. The reports from local authorities emphasize repeated bombardment and the resulting strain on local communities that lie near conflict zones, even as casualties were not reported in connection with these specific incidents. Emergency decisions were made to dispatch operational and rescue services to the affected settlement to manage consequences and restore essential services where possible.
Earlier, Gladkov provided an update noting that Russia’s air defense system intercepted an aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicle over the Belgorod region, indicating ongoing reconnaissance and aerial activity linked to hostilities in the vicinity. The interception of such drones illustrates the multifaceted nature of the conflict, where both ground bombardments and aerial incursions are reported in parallel by regional authorities as part of ongoing defense measures.
On June 30, Ukrainian forces reportedly fired seven mines at the Nekhoteevka automobile checkpoint within the Belgorod region. The incident, described by regional officials, contributes to a sequence of military actions reported near border checkpoints and transportation nodes, areas that are frequently mentioned in regional updates as surveillance and security operations continue along affected routes. These events are framed by open-source information channels and local government briefings as part of the broader information landscape surrounding the conflict.
Historically, these updates form part of a continuous stream of disclosures from regional and national authorities about the movements of Russian strategic aviation and related air defense activities. The persistent chatter about air operations and countermeasures reflects the heightened security environment in border areas and the ongoing wartime posture described by officials from both sides. In this context, authorities stress the importance of monitoring developments and maintaining readiness in the face of evolving threats and tactical adjustments in the region.