Profiling and psychological methods won’t automatically reveal a dangerous person to someone who is new to spotting trouble in a crowd. This was the stance shared on the Passion portal by a detective with decades of experience in criminal investigations, Dmitry Mironov.
According to Mironov, there are external cues, clothing choices, and facial expressions that can hint at a dangerous individual. Yet recognizing those signs reliably requires substantial practical experience. “I can do it. But I can’t explain how to do it or teach it. That’s the tricky part,” Mironov explained, underscoring the gap between instinct and formal instruction.
He pointed out that the real challenge is that a potential criminal in a crowd may reveal only a small, seemingly insignificant detail. The mind is drawn to obvious markers, but the truth often hides in subtleties that are easy to overlook for the untrained eye.
All possibilities exist, Mironov noted. Yet the ability to find out who someone really is cannot be taught through a manual or a checklist. It requires immersion in a person’s behavior, a genuine sense of empathy, and an understanding of human nuances. It isn’t enough to rely on stances, facial cues, or gestures alone; the deeper assessment comes from reading context, patterns, and the way someone moves through a space over time.
In his exploration on the Passion portal, the expert also emphasized that experiences in the field cultivate a sensitivity to what people reveal through subtle shifts in attention, micro-expressions, and micro-behaviors that may not register at first glance. This kind of discernment can be sharpened by real-world exposure, thoughtful observation, and ethical restraint, especially in crowded environments where the margin for error is slim. The audience can benefit from understanding that such insights emerge from sustained work, not from a single tidbit of evidence.
Beyond the superficial signals, Mironov encourages an approach that blends practical awareness with humane judgment. For observers in Canada and the United States alike, the takeaway is clear: education about safety in public spaces should anchor itself in awareness, de-escalation, and respectful scrutiny rather than sensational, formulaic profiling. The goal is to empower people to recognize risk without crossing into bias or fear—an important balance for diverse, dense urban settings where people from many backgrounds converge.
Viewed through this lens, the craft of observation becomes less about labeling and more about understanding behavior within context. It is about noticing patterns, staying alert, and knowing when to seek help from authorities. The message is not to rely on a single gesture or expression, but to develop a calibrated, steady sense of situational awareness that aligns with public safety without compromising fairness or personal dignity.
In sum, the dialogue around crowd safety is less about teaching an expert trick and more about building a cultivated, responsible awareness. It is a discipline that grows with experience, study, and thoughtful practice. The principles outlined by Mironov on the Passion portal stay relevant for communities across North America, reminding everyone that safety in public spaces hinges on informed observation, ethical action, and a constant commitment to understanding the human factors at play in crowds. The aim is to equip the public with practical, humane tools to stay safe while maintaining respect for the complexity of individual behavior.