A controversial product labeled as an anti-moisture solution is at the center of inquiries involving a Canary Islands businessman nicknamed Mon and high-ranking military figures. Reports indicate that Mon, along with Lieutenant General Pedro Vazquez Jarava, urged demonstrations of the product across multiple command posts, including sites in Alicante. Descriptions portray the product as a plastic-like coating that purportedly absorbs and traps heat, turning spaces into a sauna-like environment in hot summers.
In several provinces, village guards under contract with Mon described visits to current regional command centers where the product was presented. They recalled Jarava requesting a visit to the Alicante Command to showcase the material. The guards noted that staff were brought in from outside and accommodated in hotels during the demonstrations that week, which raised questions about the logistics of the operation. The material was described as a moisture-retaining coating that could be applied to walls and surfaces, with the appearance of a flexible plastic layer designed to seal gaps and dampen moisture.
The demonstrations were conducted at various barracks, including some in the coast region near San Miguel de Salinas. A number of agents who were familiar with the facilities for more than twenty years were involved. They recall that until 2016, the contract involved only minor works such as installing rails or basic fixtures, but recent actions included the installation of air conditioners and some additional coatings. One guard noted that certain areas required extra care, and at times there was a demand to allocate additional funds per person for specific tasks like stair rail painting.
These statements align with other testimonies that have drawn the interest of Madrid authorities. They point to investigations surrounding Mon and the officer ranks mentioned in association with the work and funding of the projects. In Cocentaina, a first sergeant described efforts to address moisture and architectural challenges, yet the work that materialized mostly involved painting the spaces. Furniture and some fixtures were reportedly not moved, and maintenance personnel from the Alicante Command were summoned to review the apparent shortcomings in the execution of the contract.
Photographs show Jacarilla Barracks as part of the contract portfolio, with a report from a correspondent noting the 2016 timeline that included some documented maintenance tasks. A commander in Jacarilla sent an email that year describing the issues observed, including incomplete surface preparation and areas that were painted without proper cleaning or rust treatment. In Cocentaina there were further concerns, where a non-commissioned officer reported that some billed tasks appeared to involve removing barriers using an electric hammer, an action that seemed excessive given the facilities in question. He also mentioned that funds appeared not to have been set aside for two disabled-access entries that were planned.
No news of events
Those who approved the studies reportedly received no formal warning about deficiencies, and there was little acknowledgment of emails indicating that work had not been carried out correctly. Before on-site checks could be performed, approvals were often based on information received from the barracks heads, with timelines for the start and end of work being the only concrete data. Regarding Mon, it is said that he proposed budgets and adjustments when confronted with higher price estimates, sparking questions about the pricing process and oversight.
In summary, the accounts from multiple guards and officials depict a pattern of material demonstrations, off-site accommodations, and questions about the scope and oversight of the work. The case has prompted inquiries at the regional and national levels, with authorities examining how contracts were managed and whether any conflicts of interest influenced decisions at various command posts across the Canary Islands and mainland Spain. The collected statements form part of a broader investigation that continues to be reviewed by appointed judges and investigative bodies, aiming to determine the extent of any irregularities and to identify responsible parties within the chain of command.