Videos and photos of witnesses
Experts from the Madrid-based Brigade have been collecting remains at the scene, returning to Murcia to continue their work at the site where the nightclub disaster occurred. The objective is to determine whether the debris points to a possible ignition source and to reconstruct the events that led to a fire that claimed thirteen lives. The investigation team is carefully documenting artifacts found among the rubble to understand the sequence of how the blaze started and spread.
The theoretical use of cold fire cartridges indoors is a debated topic. These devices are designed to emit minimal smoke and small sparks, which, in some setups, can appear non-intrusive. They are marketed for events like parties and weddings, and investigators are now testing whether charred cold spark containers discovered among the wreckage could be linked to the fire, whether they were used legally, or if their use may have been fraudulent. The goal is to confirm if these devices played a role in the outbreak of flames.
Ten years ago a candidate for Tenerife’s carnival became the focus of attention after a pyrotechnic element, part of the decorative effects on a costume, exploded and caused severe injuries. Experts on the scene emphasized that cold fire should always be supervised by qualified professionals and controlled to prevent accidents.
Meanwhile, operators from specialized firms are planning to undertake cleanup of the site. Restoring order at the former nightclub is a major task, and the costs are expected to be borne by the insurers of the damaged establishments. The cleanup operation is projected to extend over at least a 48-hour period as teams remove debris and verify structural integrity.
Witness accounts and emerging evidence
About twenty witnesses visited police stations to share observations from the morning of the incident. Some recorded what they saw or captured on cameras, and investigators have already secured many videos and photos from personal devices. These materials are being reviewed to build a clearer picture of the sequence of events and identify key moments in the timeline.
There is speculation, based on early findings, that the fire may have originated in one venue and spread to another, with rooms sharing a common space separated by a light partition. Officials caution that such theories require careful validation before conclusions can be drawn. The investigation remains ongoing, and fire officials’ reports, along with forensic analyses, will continue to inform the case.
Researchers emphasize the need for patience while the inquiry proceeds. They note that no final hypothesis can be confirmed until all forensic tests are complete and a comprehensive summary is prepared, in alignment with the court’s directions and standard investigative procedures. The situation remains fluid as teams work to piece together the full story behind the tragedy.
Regulatory gaps and potential penalties
Officials caution that the regional framework for events and demonstrations does not have a single, broad standard applicable to all scenarios. This has been described as a period of legal uncertainty that affects how authorities regulate public entertainment and similar activities. A regional lawyers’ association for accident victims and civil liability has issued a statement highlighting the issue. In Murcia, in the absence of a specific regulation, the national Environmental Protection Law may be invoked, though it does not fully address the particulars of public entertainment operations. One article within the law touches on serious environmental damage and the possibility of sanctions if activities occur without proper permitting, with consequences for environmental protection and public health.
The association notes that penalties could range widely, and that cases of unlicensed activity may be deemed very serious when environmental degradation or health risks are substantial. They also point to broader administrative procedures that govern compensation processes and legal remedies for those affected by such incidents. In this context, authorities stress that compliance with licensing requirements and environmental regulations remains essential to prevent future tragedies.
As investigations continue, authorities and legal experts are monitoring how existing statutes are applied to incidents of this nature, and what reforms or clarifications might be needed to reduce risk in the future. The prioritization remains ensuring public safety, accurate fact-finding, and fair accountability for failures that may contribute to such calamities (ANAVA-RC).