Global meat consumption is largely driven by industrial farming, with substantial reports noting serious environmental costs. A new scientific study highlights clear environmental and nutritional benefits from seafood that could guide dietary shifts toward fish and shellfish in place of some red meat.
The research appears in Communications Earth & Environment and evaluates how seafoods meet daily nutrient needs while keeping climate impacts low. It assesses nutrient density and greenhouse gas emissions, measured across production methods from wild catch to aquaculture, for globally important species.
The authors conclude that seafood is a notably nutritious food with comparatively modest climate costs. They state that meaningful emission reductions can be achieved by changing protein sources while preserving or improving nutrition to support public health.
There are significant differences in climate performance across and even within species groups, largely determined by how the seafood is produced or harvested, from capture fishery practices to farming methods.
The document suggests that increasing the consumption of small pelagic fish caught in the wild, along with trout and bivalves, could markedly lower greenhouse gas emissions while enhancing nutrition, especially if red meat intake is reduced.
Blue and Green Diets
The authors acknowledge obstacles but say there is potential to steer seafood production and consumption toward species that optimize nutrition and minimize climate emissions, both in species selection and production practices.
— Mussels exposure to environmental change, the study notes, highlights the need to rethink seafood sourcing and consumption patterns in the direction of sustainability.
According to the researchers, sustainable seafood can deliver more nutrients than beef, pork, and chicken while lowering emissions. The findings support policies that substitute seafood for other animal proteins to improve future food security and address climate change.
The goal for diets is twofold: improve global nutrition and reduce the climate footprint to offset population growth. Fish and shellfish are strong sources of protein, fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals, with prior work suggesting environmental benefits from replacing meat with seafood.
Yet many climate-friendly dietary proposals emphasize plant-based options and sometimes overlook blue diets based on shellfish and other seafood products. The current study analyzes both naturally caught and farmed seafood across a spectrum of fisheries and aquacultureystems to assess nutrient density and climate effects.
Salmon, Herring, Mackerel, Anchovies, Mussels, Oysters
The analysis identified salmon, herring, mackerel, and anchovies along with farmed mussels and oysters as having the lowest climate impact relative to their nutritional value. Half of the shellfish species examined showed higher nutrient density with lower greenhouse gas emissions than beef, pork, and chicken.
Variability in climate effects stems from differences in production and harvesting methods. To further reduce emissions, the industry is encouraged to adopt fuel efficient fishing technologies and to consider reviving populations where feasible. The authors also note that aquaculture can increase overall production and provide more climate-friendly options.
While the study centers on greenhouse gas emissions, it also points to the potential of seafood to offer a sustainable, nutritious food source that benefits the climate. The researchers advocate policies that promote sustainable seafood consumption as part of climate action and nutrition strategies.
The conclusion is clear: policies addressing climate change and malnutrition should encourage sustainable seafood consumption. The authors invite readers to consider the broader benefits of shifting dietary patterns toward seafood in combination with improved production practices, which could foster ecological awareness and healthier eating habits in various regions, including Western nations. A recent study from a French research institute notes notable shifts in meat consumption patterns in Europe over the past five years by a majority of consumers.
Reference: Nature Communications Earth & Environment study on seafood and climate impacts. Attribution: Tyedmers, Hallström, and colleagues across wild and farmed seafood systems. See the cited work for details.
…
Contact details for the environment department have been removed in this version.