JMislata 4th instruction unitwhich searches Inflatable castle accident on January 4During the Christmas Fair, The plane, which had nine children on board, killed Vera, 4, and Cayetana, 8, 8 years old.he has The number of inquiries increased The case was opened on two counts of reckless manslaughter.
Thus, the magistrate municipal technician Rubén SG is reportedly under investigationwhich has already taken it as an expression murder group between National Policehowever as a witness. The municipal technician appears on the file and who, According to parts engineer José Pablo B.L.., What did he do attraction and fairground approval report and this is one of them Three criminal charges have been filed so far. on the case with both carnivalmade On-site inspection on 3 Decembera month before the event, just when the fair was about to open its doors.
To who not charged At least for now, it is To the Assembly Member of Mislata City Council in Charge of Festivities, Anthony Arenasas requested by private prosecution parents exercising verawho they think the mayor should be investigated in criminal proceedings, it ultimately responsible for the lack of control How was the fair established?
In this sense, the judge issued an order, which he claimed. “there is no place To get a statement from Antonio Almenar as an inspector at the time of this procedure”, what leaves open the door where i can in the futureif the councilor is convinced that he can assumed any responsibility Starting from here pending lawsuits.
The forensic expert has already pointed that out.
The judge’s summary comes immediately after receiving the document. forensic expert report from whom full analysis of everything ever done. That report more than 120 pages Y exclusively reported Levante-EMV of the Iberian Press group, this week yes drew attention to its potential liability. Municipality of Mislata.
In that sense, he thinks he’s there enough “significant changes” in the first project one of the important documents for the town hall, presented by the clerks in front of the town hall. permission to occupy public roadsas if there were at least the necessary explanations.
Specifically, the expert states in his comprehensive report: these changes were “overlooked” as it is necessary for those responsible at least one addition to the project offered by the parts engineer or the non-compliance of City Council officials [de Mislata] liability statement, because It directly affects users and their security.”
Location and distribution of the fair
At this point in the report, he refers to three people. fundamental facts that have an impact in the accident: The location of the fair was not established –They used the summer project for the New Year–, attractions are not placed as advertised document and above all, the bouncy castle was neither where nor howbetween two other attractions, but a end of the fairwith the widest side facing straight ahead point of the last wind it blew it up.
despite root cause Considered by both the Police and the Forensic Expert lack of anchor and poor condition and quality of ropes and straps emerging broken, some and cut, othersaround the attraction, location and direction of swelling was one of the softening factors by all indicators. wind gust fully in the lower part and lift up.
Have you personally inspected or not?
municipal technician, court as a researcher and therefore with legal aidnext Januaryoverlapping with first anniversary of bouncy castle event.
as he financial as the charges would ask formal if he personally inspected the fairground on December 3as maintained by party engineer investigated in caseor if you haven’t and did not go to the fair as these dates reported to the policewhen he argued that he had been inspected by the city council It’s not mandatory, it’s optional. because it has a consortium responsible party statement in theory, it kept the good condition of the attractions and the correct setup of the fair as a whole.