this Supreme Court Approved the decision of the High Court of Justice of Catalonia (TSJC) in what order did he confirm this Barcelona CourtCase in which the author of the crime and sexual assault of a minor under 13 was sentenced to permanent imprisonment on June 4, 2018, in Vilanova i la Geltrú.Little went down the stairs of his grandfather’s house alone to stop him and bring him home against his will. She jumped on him and attacked her sexual freedom by threatening with a knife. In addition, he put a collar around his neck and strongly held the little one’s throat with his hands until he choked.
The man was sentenced to seven years in prison for sexual assault with the simple mitigating factor of repairing the damage, and to a re-examinable permanent prison for brutal murder with the same mitigating factor. Almighty, this the amount you contribute is insignificant to repair such serious damagetherefore, it does not share the mitigating factor applied, but declares that the sentence is ineligible as it is commuted to a reviewable permanent prison sentence. betrayal, cruelty and dealing with the murder of a child under the age of 16 after a crime against sexual freedom.
The resolution is particularly emphasized How did the prisoner catch and kill the girl without being able to defend her in any way?, because he weighed about 37 kilograms and was 1.52 centimeters tall, while the accused weighed 95 kilograms and was 1.79 centimeters tall. Given the difference in weight and height between the minor and the defendant (and considering that the defendant used a knife, which injured the minor several times), the jury concluded: the victim saw his ability to defend himself clearly diminish attackperpetrator of crime.
aimless cruel evil
The Supreme Court states that “the little one’s father was at his grandparents’ house and went down the stairs to meet his father.” Unfortunately, the person he met was the appellant.with the cruel behavior and attitude that introduced him to the apartment he was going to sexually abuse, ending his life and ending the life of a 13-year-old girl as a human being, and undoubtedly the lives of her direct and indirect relatives who find themselves in the unexpected death of their little girl”.
“It was death not because of an accident or illness, but because of deviant behavior. When he quickly sees a girl coming down the stairs, he finds himself complicit in the persecution, bringing her home, sexually assaulting her and strangling her with a knife as described in proven facts. The truth contained tremendous seriousness and high criminal reproach, which the legislator wanted and envisaged in such a case, ”confirms.
Supreme confirms TSJC’s assessment of how the girl’s life was ended. It is considered that he behaved cruelly by saying, “The way to end a life by drowning is slow, painful, conscious and cruel. We also believe that there is cruelty in terms of bruises, abrasions and stab wounds.” He adds that “it intentionally causes other evils that exceed those necessarily connected with the typical act, so it is objectively unnecessary to achieve the result that seeks to incite further suffering to the victim.”aimless cruel evil”.