violation presumption of innocence. is he one argument by serial killer’s lawyer Jorge Ignacio Palma Jacome Applying to TSJ sentenced to 159 years and 11 months in prison for murder Arlene Ramos, Lady Marcela Vargas and attempts against Marta Calvo and six other women.
lawyer Mary Herreraexpert in drug trafficking cases, looking full break that blameof drug trafficking jury found proven what did he do with the ten victims forcing them to use cocaine and treacherously insert into the genitalsas a domino effect, to destroy their guilt in murder and sexual abuse.
Herrera argues cocaine not analyzed in no case – it was done in Arliene’s case and it turned out to be so naive that only someone with access to new drugs from South America could have more than 80% of it – and the jury was taken away. by the testimony of only six survivors.
The same argument is what led him to deny ten counts of sexual abuse and ten counts of murder. In fact, she complains that, throughout the 16 pages of her appeal, her client was convicted solely on the basis of the testimonies of the living victims, ignoring that testimony. constitutes proof in itself. meets, as it were, necessary requirements and leaving it aside too much evidence for the jury to know first hand at trial.
It also complains – in reality the source is a compilation of what they were exposed to and protested at the trial– of which Palma Jacome they couldn’t see their victims testifying, It’s more of an issue than has been recognized in the legal system, especially since the Victim’s Status was ratified in 2015, and it calls for a right not to have to face the gaze of their aggressors again.
In any case reject the major
Arliene’s claim your client has not been proven to be carrying cocaine above and criticizes the judge for putting the autopsy in questiona -discredited at trial- and the coroner’s work and Lady Marcelahe was there DNA from another customer The number of women in addition to Palma’s, and the hours were not collected in a thesis she tried to present without success in the trial, mixing night and morning hours because the transcript of the WhatsApp conversation between the killer and his victim did not indicate that the term PM was in the afternoon.
Defense judge criticizes, calling it “incredible” that he convicted his client of murdering Marta
The strong point is once again with Marta Calvo. So, use this fact: “body found”something derived your client was careful not to say what he was doing with her, for refute the murder and the introduction of cocaine into his genitals. Even condemns the jury It’s based on “only” Palma’s model of criminal behavior, which is exactly what qualifies him as a serial killer.
It even reaches the magistrate’s trademark as “incredible”Herrera and her attitude towards her client continuous protection during trial precisely to preserve the presumption of innocence, Convicted of “DEATH” It is the only work by Marta Calvo to use capital letters.