the accused atrium vault to be continued in prison. This was just reported by Provincial Court Caceres Two days later, a hearing was held to decide the appeal filed by their lawyers for their release.
In the decision, the Chamber justifies its decision “based on the existence of flight risk, reasonable signs of guilt” Already “repetition of offense in the man’s case and possible cooperation in some of these offenses of his partner”.
The case therefore proceeds with the pace of the investigation, since the deliberation took place only 48 hours after the three magistrates had taken the parties, Sylvia Córdoba, the defendant’s lawyer on the one hand, and Sylvia Córdoba, on the other hand, to defend their positions. other, insurance company, now the main private prosecution because the hotel owners got compensation for the wines.
The defense attorney argued before the courtroom magistrates last Wednesday: Judgment of Judge Aida de la Cruz de la Torre from court no. 4“disproportionate” in relation to the crime for which they are charged, Forced robbery punishable by up to six years in prison under the Criminal Code.
However, the insurer demanded that the judge’s decision be upheld a month earlier, ordering him to enter Cáceres prison.
Eleven criminal convictions
In the car, Oda details the basis of his decision point by point. First, he states the following regarding the risk of escape, which the Provincial Office of the Chief Public Prosecutor himself has already proven: “The roots they claim to have are not accredited” With regard to Córdoba’s defense of their Madrid residence. The report also highlights the “high activity” of recent months as they had traveled six different countries before when they were arrested in Croatia.
Regarding his involvement in the alleged events, he claims that “it is not the time to make a decision about the events or to take responsibility for the events”, but that the outcome of the proceedings carried out “reveal enough plural clues.”
Likewise, he mentions one of the defendants, Constantin Dumitru, of repeat guilt, on which they weigh in. eleven criminal convictions against property, domestic violence, criminal violations, assault and theft.
Finally, the decision touches on one of the points the defense attorney made to request the release of Priscila Lara Guevara on the grounds that she was suffering from a variety of worsening ailments in prison. In this regard, the Chamber states that “prison health services: not suffering from major diseases, She said she was not taking medication and was only showing mild discomfort that was duly treated.
What punishment are the defendants sentenced to?
The two people charged with the Atrio robbery are accused of forced theft in matters set out in Article 241 of the Penal Code. In this case, there are cases covered in section 4 of this article. According to this article, “if the acts mentioned in the previous sections are particularly serious, depending on the way the crime was committed or the damage caused, and in any case, a prison sentence of two to six years is imposed. , when any of the conditions referred to in article 235 are applicable ». However, it remains to determine the legal liability that the defendants will face, namely the amount of compensation that the insurer will claim for the value of the wines.
Regarding the parties, it is the public ministry that makes the request for conviction. At this time, it is not known how much the insurer’s claim, which was questioned this Wednesday and was presented as a private charge. For its part, the defendants’ defense claims they are innocent.