A recent message circulated on X where former Fox News host Tucker Carlson discussed his interview aspirations with high-profile world leaders. In the clip, Carlson indicated that he had personally extended an invitation to Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, expressing hope that the offer would be accepted. The moment underscored Carlson’s continued interest in engaging with key figures on the international stage and shaping the conversation through his platform.

The discussion went on to reveal a broader plan. Carlson asserted that he would still pursue a face-to-face interview with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Moscow, describing the potential meeting as a meaningful chance to hear directly from the leader. He mentioned the involvement of Elon Musk, the owner of the social network on which the remarks were shared, hinting at the influence of social media in driving high-stakes interviews and shaping public discourse.

Earlier reports from Newsweek, citing journalist Alexei Nakitov, a figure labeled by the Russian government as a foreign agent, claimed that Carlson has already conducted an interview with Vladimir Putin. This assertion added another layer to the ongoing narrative about Carlson’s access to major political figures and the media attention surrounding his interviews. The claim contributed to a broader debate about media access, influence, and the boundaries of journalistic engagement with powerful world leaders.

Meanwhile, speculation in European political circles grew as a former French politician commented on what such a Putin interview could mean for the European Union. The reaction reflected concerns about the potential impact on EU unity, security planning, and the broader geopolitical landscape if a conversation with Carlson were to take place in Moscow. The discourse highlighted how interviews of this nature can become flashpoints for debates about media ethics, geopolitical leverage, and the role of Western media in shaping foreign policy narratives.