A Boeing 767 was parked for takeoff last night. Rwanda At Boscombe Down Royal Air Force Base, 130 kilometers from London. Several police units were monitoring the area in Wiltshire, England. Then last day to appeal in court Among those trying to avoid deportation, the number required to board a plane was significantly lower than initially expected. if at first government United Kingdom 150 irregular shipments expected, there were sevenWhat should be on a plane that, according to the British press, costs 600 million euros. Bullshit that never fixes the problem. On the same Tuesday, 300 people without papers arrived in Dover harbor by boat. It was over a hundred on Monday.
government Boris Johnson I made it clear that the number of deportees is not important.. As a deterrent to deter networks organizing human trafficking in the English Channel, the flight had to depart at all costs. “Finding a humane way of doing this was extremely difficult. It doesn’t make sense to try to send back ships detected in the English Channel, these are very dangerous waters, we must work humanely and with compassion because that’s what needs to be done but at the same time we need to break the way groups workJohnson declared at the head of the cabinet.
lawyers in crime
Despite major controversy and legal challenges, Johnson deportation plans to the African country. “We think we have formed an appropriate partnership with Rwanda. And yes, it may take some time to work properly, but that doesn’t mean it won’t continue.complicity in the affairs of criminal gangs. With this, they undermine confidence in the legal system.”
When asked if it was time for the UK to leave the European Convention on Human Rights, given the legal obstacles, Johnson did not rule out such a possibility. “Is it necessary to change some laws to help us move forward? It can be like this. All options are under constant review.” This decision would have been even more drastic and controversial, but the test bubble has already been launched.
bishop’s letter
In many cases, criticism of the policy of forcible deportation of individuals, they come to seek asylum, fleeing countries at warLeave Johnson out in the cold where they suffer persecution and violence and divide the British. 44% think it’s a good idea, 40% oppose.
In a letter to The Times, he described the 23 dioceses of the Church of England in the House of Lords, headed by the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Archbishop of York: An “immoral” plan that “embarrasses Great Britain”. “Those deported to Rwanda have no chance to appeal or be reunited with their families in England. His asylum request, recognition of his medical condition or other needs were not taken into account.” The same newspaper over the weekend repeated a specific comment by Prince Charles describing the new immigration practice as “terrible”. Johnson denied the interpretation was correct, but no House source has denied it.
Supreme Review
An agreement was reached with the Rwandan government last April, and the prime minister at the time announced: “Tens of thousands” of fugitives will be sent to that country in the coming years.. The plan will apply to men without families who enter illegally by boat or trucks. Deportees cannot return to the UK. As it has been stated, “a one-way ticket”, unless the Supreme Court decides otherwise in the coming weeks after an in-depth review of the government’s plan, which is still pending. The United Nations also warned that this policy violated the “spirit of the letter” of the international obligations of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees by shifting responsibility for asylum seekers to another country.