One lime and one sand. this Reform of the CO2 emission quota trading systemThis Wednesday, one of the pillars of the climate legislative package (called ‘Fit for 55’) that the European Union wants to reduce pollutant emissions by 55% by 2030, big sled during it parliamentary procedure due to political differences between left-wing groups advocating more demand for the industry and those adhering to a more flexible schedule, such as conservatives. A conflict that resulted in a majority of the European Parliament rejecting the proposal and returning it to the environmental commission. On the other hand, the proposal to ban its sale new vehicles with internal combustion engines from 2035.
The original plan of the European Commission was to cut 100% of CO2 emissions from new passenger cars and pickup trucks by 2035. veto cars with diesel and petrol engines as well as hybrids (Those produced before this date may continue to be sold.) in order to advance towards decarbonisation of the automotive industry and Closer to neutrality in 2050. The European People’s Party tried until the last moment smooth cropping He changed the schedule by up to 90% to make it clearer for the industry, but the change failed to materialize on a long and chaotic voting day.
The Greens and Social Democrats do not accept this weakening of the proposal. (Groups) ECR and ID always vote against, so there is no majority. This shows that (groups) ECR and ID cannot agree with beloved PPE”, explained Dutch environmentalist MEP, Bass Eickhout, on the reasons for the cancellation of the proposal to reform the emissions quota system. What caused the explosion was the various PPE changes backed by liberals and ultra-conservatives, which softened the initial proposals and delayed them to 2034. phasing out free emission rights pFor 10,000 industrial plants affected by the quota change system.
This change caused leftist groups to change the direction of their votes and to oppose it. “The Social Democrats and Greens have not taken their responsibility for climate protection. This is a bad day for Parliament”, the German conservative complained Peter High School He recalled that the proposal was positive as it raised the reduction target for 2030 to 63% (environment committee requested 67%) compared to the 61% proposed by Brussels. “They cannot demand the vote of the far right to curb ambition and then demand our vote to support it as a whole,” the leader of the socialists summarized, iratxe garcia.
Look for a new consensus
As a result, the text will now be sent back to the responsible parliamentary committee for the groups to try to find a new consensus. “We will do whatever is necessary as soon as possible,” said the French liberal. Pascal Canfin. For now, however, inter-institutional negotiations with the Council that will determine its position at the end of the month will not be able to start, which will lead to delays in the approval of this important climate plan. 27 of the Border Carbon Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which would impose a CO2 tax on imports of carbon-intensive products such as steel or cement, and the European Parliament also chose to postpone the vote because the three regulations are interlinked.
The European Parliament has succeeded in advancing its position in the carbon market for the European Union. air sector and the hitherto excluded international air emissions compensation system, which means inter-agency negotiations with the Council can begin. According to the position adopted by MEPs, the emissions trading system should apply to all flights departing from an airport located in the European Economic Area and liberal rights should be phased out by 2025. The report includes exceptions for flights to or from the outermost regions. . It also confirmed Regulation on the reduction of CO2 emissions in the land use sector.