HE Treasure knows them all retirees those who pay their labor partners and Social Security simultaneously Between 1967 and 1978 Same tax breaks as banking retirees We made it thanks to one Supreme Court decision. In response to a question from the Workers’ Commissions, the General Directorate of Taxes stated that previous contributors to other partner associations They did not benefit from any deduction on their income tax returns Since they have paid two installments, they are entitled to be compensated with a discount on the pension amount calculated by the Tax Office as personal income tax base. This decision allows thousands of retirees to claim tax compensation.
The list of sectors that continued to make dual contributions until 1978, when the definitive integration of mutual associations into Social Security took place, includes: Multiple groups of officials appointed to MufaceLike teachers, as Antonio Conchillo, general secretary of the Regional Federation of UGT Retirees, explains.
there is also industrial workersBazán, who was the first to complain, as did those at commerce and Telefónica. The biggest challenge they face receive a certificate of fees paid Between 1967 and 1978, they applied to their joint association to go to the tax office.
Supreme Court decision also allows beneficiaries request corrections to the last four tax returns. The amount of the repayment depends on the years of contribution up to 1978, but in some cases it can be up to thousands of euros.
The Supreme Court decision ruled that the contributions paid by former bank employees to Social Security since its establishment in 1967, considered a deductible expense Income Tax, but there was no tax withheld from contributions paid to the Banking Workforce Partnership.
Carlos Bravo, CCOO’s confederal secretary for Public Policy and Social Protection, explained to Prensa Ibérica’s La Opinión de Murcia: There are two decisions on appeal at the Supreme Court The doctrine contained in the bank’s decision was reinforced.
Considering that the decision also gives other retirees the opportunity to claim rights they had maintained the double listingBravo applied to the General Directorate of Taxes and received a positive response.
The official answer includes the following statements: “In case other working partners have been subject to the same legislation over the years regarding their establishment, auditing and integration into Social Security, and if their contributions and benefits are also subject to the same legislation.” Like the Banking Labor Reciprocity regime, this Management Center, in accordance with what was stated by the Supreme Court, The portion of the aid corresponding to contributions made to these labor partner associations between January 1, 1967 and December 31, 1978 must be included as 75% work performance.“.
However, the General Directorate of Taxes does not comment. about the difficulties retirees have in obtaining certificates proving their contributions. “This is a matter of evidence, the assessment of which is beyond the powers of this Executive Centre,” he states. Carlos Bravo points out that workers working for companies that have disappeared have a much harder time obtaining certification.