He bragged about being a police officer When she was surprised at an ‘illegal’ party with some friends in May 2020 covid confinement. Therefore, the director of the Ávila Academy sanctioned him with 15 points deducted from his final grades, which meant the loss of all his rights and Prospects for overcoming opposition To enter the body. Now the Supreme Court approves the sanction in question, despite the fact that the candidate agent received the support of the Prosecutor’s Office in his appeal.
The Supreme Court also, for the purposes of the case, indifferent which is Constitutional Court found the state of alarm unconstitutionalbecause he was not punished academically for attending a party during quarantine, but was punished for using his Police cadet status without reason.
The decision, available to El Periódico de España from the Prensa Ibérica group, is dated the 16th and the speaker is Controversial Administrative Magistrate, José Luis Requero. The events that occurred during the appellant’s distress are never questioned. birthday party with seventeen other people More on 2 May 2020, with the first state of alarm declared by the Government coming into force.
When the police arrived at the scene and asked those present to identify themselves, the applicant student showed his National Police School Student Card A, indicating his status.
This fact was evaluated as follows: serious crime As provided for in the Interim Regulations of the National Police School, and as a result, the Chief Commissioner and director of the National Police School allowed to lose 15 points from the total of marks obtained at the end of the course, subtracting proportionately the corresponding part of the total in each subject.
As a result, social skills and communication in the English language were put on hold, so this was agreed upon. exclusion from the selection process and definitive withdrawal with the loss of all rights and expectations of rights arising from exceeding the opposition stage.
The High Court of Justice of Madrid approved the sanction, citing the principle of legality in sanction matters, on the grounds that the decision of the academy director was included in this Law. Law on the Disciplinary Regime of the National Police Service, 2010 and temporary sanctions regulations based on constitutional doctrine.
The Supreme Court’s analysis was limited to analyzing whether the regulation of the disciplinary regime for student police officers in the Interim Regulation was in compliance with the principle of legality. pre-constitutional norm before the law covering it.
In this context, he concludes that its validity is not questioned, and this is clearly evident from the founding law, “Article 2 of which provides that trainee officers are subject to the rules of the disciplinary regime established in the police training center regulations.”