High Court of Justice of the Commonwealth of Valencia Confirmed 35 years in prison for him Review teacher and the owner of an academy in the municipality of l’Horta sexually abused of the Eight underage students aged 14 to 16, during lessons. Thus, it completely rejects the appeal made by Sergio TT’s defense and upholds the decision of the Third Chamber of the Valencian Provincial Court, which the same newspaper had previously put forward.
In the sentence cited above, six perpetual sexual abuse offenses of victims under the age of 16 and two other students who have reached that age are declared authoritative. In any event, the Chamber shall “to take advantage of the favorable conditions provided by the practice of his profession” touching minors “when approached to explain or explain some aspect of the tasks they have to do.”
In some cases he touched her breasts, in others he touched the inner thighs of the student under the pretext that he was going to take the student’s cell phone between her legs.
The TSJCV rebuts one by one the arguments put forward by the defense, appreciating, among other things, violation of the presumption of innocence, failure to evaluate exculpatory evidence, lack of motivation, and error in assessing evidence. However, the decision states that: “The statement of proven facts in the sentence remains unchanged” and said that the appellant “did not propose an alternative style to the historical narrative of the sentence.”
The touching occurred during refresher classes between courses from 2015 to 2018 at an academy in l’Horta.
Therefore, he explains, “there are several confirmatory elements” that show the lack of objective incredulity of minors. “The persistence of victims in the essential aspects of their statements”.
Likewise, with regard to the party’s psychological report, the sentence indicates that “the defendant did not have the psychopathological characteristics of the abuser and did not have a personality that prevented him from controlling his impulses. He said that he had committed the acts that were charged against him”. Likewise, “it doesn’t matter if the classroom door stays open or closed when things happen.”
The touch occurred during refresher classes Between courses from 2015 to 2018 at an academy in l’Horta. The convict claimed in the case that there were simple frictions uncovered by special prosecution lawyers Amparo Vicó and Marta Soriano: “A touch is not taking the breast and squeezing it”.