president of CEV Salvador Navarroargued this Tuesday The State should assume 73% of the Valencian Community’s debt According to the reports prepared by Fedea and Ivie, this insufficient funding Who gets autonomy? He drew attention to this in his speech at the meeting. Alicante Club Forum Informationin which disputed this claimbased on studies According to calculations initiated by Junts per Catalunya, A week ago it was predicted as follows: 450,000 million With this autonomy, the euro is considered the historical debt of the state.
“They wanted 450 million to ask for something, but There is no empirical analysis to say that it is so. 73% of debt, according to analysis from Ivie and Fedea (from Generalitat Valenciana) This is the fault of inadequate funding.“, he assured when asked about this issue. “They will achieve something in the end, because this is something that has happened historically to different governments that had to deal with the Basques and Catalans,” the business leader reminded. The need Presence of Valencian politics at state level.
In this sense, he defined it as follows:indefensible“Consel’s current debt 55,000 million eurosand reminded that interest payment currently represents one of the largest items in regional budgets. “I want the next government to know what we are aiming for and what we will advocate in the Fair Financing Platform,” he pointed out, including the forgiveness of most of this debt, a new financing system adapted to the population, the full implementation of investments for the Valenciana Community, and the creation of a leveling fund while the system is changed.
Amnesty
Navarro when asked about the possible amnesty requested by Catalan independence parties in support of Pedro Sánchez He lamented the current “polarization” He made statements on Spanish politics and called on the parties to ease the conflict and offer more “certainty”. As for amnesty, he assured that he “didn’t like” the way it was proposed. Therefore, although he accepted the necessity of the Constitution adapting to new times and demands, he pointed out that the “logical thing” was: Any changes to Magna Carta will be made by an overwhelming majority Unilateral solutions will be avoided.