He sued three key leaders of the Ministry of Equality. Irene Montero, Victoria Rosell and Ángela Rodríguez ‘Pam’, The lawsuit was filed accusing the former porn actress of “degrading herself, tarnishing her image and damaging her reputation” by financing with public money an exhibition against sexual abuse held at Atocha station last January, in which she was accused of “advocating rape and pedophilia”. Now, former porn actress Amarna Miller accused themselves and filed a criminal complaint with the Supreme Court. one crime of hate, another crime of insult and slanderCASO ABIERTO, Prensa Ibérica’s investigative and events channel, has learned.
Their complaints are also directed against the director and designer of the performance, as well as a senior official at Adif, who allowed the exhibition to be held on their premises.
“Trample feminism”
The exhibition called “Low MarketThe banner, titled: Reflections on prostitution and pornography in the construction of masculinities, consisted of banners containing the following accusations against Miller: “Amarna has no sisterhood, she uses feminism to defend something she shouldn’t, and crush the bus (…). She doesn’t know what feminist ethics is and defends pedophilia and rape“.
He condemned the performance as “criminalising the pro-rights feminist collective advocating the decriminalization of prostitution” for which the influencer was the “poster”.
There were also panels with mannequins representing the “objectification of the female body” and anti-pornography texts. In many of these, Miller was identified with his initials: “What AM said was instilled in him in his childhood, and he sees it as normal to pass it on. He is working on it, and it is in his interest to defend it. Amarna He wants us to change our perspective on porn just because it’s good for him.“.
Amarna Miller thinks the “serious accusations” against her at the exhibition constitute the crime of inciting hatred “due to gender and ideology” Against part of the feminist collective: “The message sent is criminal libertarian or pro-rights feminismdefending decriminalization of prostitution and sex workers” because (in the performance) “Miller, the standard bearer of rights feminism, is directly accused of advocating rape and pedophilia”.
The Ministry of Equality provided 14 thousand 999 euros of public funds for the exhibition, which also included banners against Miller: “She does not know what feminist ethics are, she defends pedophilia and rape.”
The influencer also details in her complaint that along with the exhibition, the defendants launched a “frontal attack” against members of the feminist group she belonged to, specifically saying: “It is an attack against their ideology, their gender, their sexual orientation, and also because of their gender.”.
“A mockery of feminism”
“Although she is being directly attacked, her reputation as a highly publicized figure among the public, media and nationally for her feminism struggle and social work is also being damaged,” he adds. The former porn actress assures that the “grave insults” directed at her at the demonstration in Atocha were effective undermined his credibility“Miller’s ideology and interventions have been viewed as a misconception by much of the feminist collective. Parody or mockery of feminism“.
Miller is asking the High Court to question both the director and designer of the exhibition, the Minister for Equality, the Government representative against Gender-Based Violence, the Secretary of State for Equality and Adif’s manager. He also demands compensation from the defendants. 280,000 euros for damages caused by them.
public funds
In her complaint, the former porn actress assures that Montero, Rosell, and Rodríguez “reviewed the project, approved it, and were rewarded.” 14,999 euros public funds According to the woman who posed naked on her social networks to vote for Podemos in the general elections in 2015, the three leaders of Equality “They took an active role in the selection of the exhibition” and as the “contracting authority of the ministry” they are “responsible” for this.
According to documents submitted by the actor in his complaint, the Ministry of Equality funded the exhibition “to some extent”. direct reward “Because it was a small contract, it was not advertised.” Sources from the Ministry of Equality, upon being asked by OPEN CASE, stated that the exhibition that was opened was “contained” by Rosell. Statements and opinions of adolescents about the subject of the exhibition”.
“Nothing artistic”
“It cannot be denied that the authors’ intention was: defame and discredit Amarna, for no other purpose than to wage a genuine campaign against gender-based violence and trafficking in women, and not to use the public treasury to discredit an influencer who is an unscathed advocate of the fight against gender-based violence and who trafficks it, ” Martínez-Echevarría law firm Miller, represented by , states in his complaint.
It adds: “Such a brutal attack, funded and carried out with the connivance of the Department for Equality, left Miller distrustful of the same institution that promotes equality and respect and created a serious fear of expressing himself freely in public.” Contacted in this way, Neither Miller’s lawyers nor those around him wanted to comment..
The former porn actress criticizes the “accusations made against her in the exhibition, saying they are ‘bad and very serious’.”There is nothing artistic about attributing criminal acts (like advocating rape and pedophilia) to an innocent person.
“Seeking Equality”
His lawyers recall that Miller was “an artist of recognized prestige and publicity in Spain” due to his career as an activist and feminist popularizerShe received awards for her activities towards women’s rights.
In his complaint, Miller states that everything that happened caused him “economic harm,” that he “lost employment contracts” as a result of the exposure, and even experienced “depressive and anxious periods” due to “unfair persecution.” Equality and the modification of personality by its assistants”.