HE Supreme Court Reduced 14 and 7 years imprisonment to 12 and 6 years Two brothers raped an underage boy after getting drunk at his home in Madrid, where he went to work as a babysitter, of the app Only yes law is yes.
The events took place in April 2017. The 17-year-old victim went to the house sent by her aunt, who learned that the tenants were looking for a babysitter on the 24th.
There, he was greeted by one of the convicts, the father of the baby, and after telling him about the job, he invited him for a drink and began stroking him, despite asking him to stop.
Far from pausing, the prisoner “gave him a few glasses of beer to cloud his senses” and got the underage boy somewhere. drunkennessAccording to the sentence reached by EFE, he robbed and raped the accused, unable to do anything because of his drunken state and his obesity.
On the 26th, the victim’s aunt reminded her that she had to go back to work in the same household because she had dedicated herself to the baby’s mother in this way, so she felt compelled to return so as not to disappoint the little boy’s aunt. and because he needed work.
The youngest came that day, went for a walk with the baby, and when he returned, the father was already awake. Again she brewed a few alcoholic drinks and accepted, but when he offered to have sex the underage refused.
At that time, another convict came out of one of the rooms, the brother of the previous room caught the young woman, took advantage of her drunkenness, and raped her. A short time later, the father entered this room, took the child against his will, to the bedroom, and raped her again, although he said he wanted to leave.
Later, knowing that the baby’s mother was about to come home, both defendants left the child on the portal. The young woman wandering the street was taken to the hospital on suspicion of mild alcohol poisoning.
Madrid Court sentenced father to 14 years in prison for two crimes rape and the brother was sentenced to 7 years in prison for a crime, In a sentence upheld by the Madrid High Court of Justice.
But now, while the Supreme Court only applies the law that says yes is yes, it reduces the penalty by one for the first two years and one for the second, because it is more beneficial for both, that is, it stays in 12 and 6 years.
Beyond this technical question, the Court rejects all allegations by the convicts accusing the victim’s contradictions and serious inconsistencies, as the Chamber’s statement emphasized the young woman’s reliability and determination.