In June last year, the European Commission submitted a proposal to force it. reduce usage by 50% pesticide more dangerous In the European Union by 2030 it will evolve into different national targets, depending on the initial state of each Member State. The Community Manager did not take into account the consequences for agriculture of the Russian invasion of Ukraine when presenting this proposal, so last December Member States asked the Commission to prepare a new impact analysis.
In the same week, Brussels published its new impact analysis confirming that the pesticide reduction targets envisioned in the bill were confirmed.do not threaten food security”. “The short-term negative effects of Russia’s aggressive war against Ukraine do not change this outcome,” the EC said in a statement.
Conversely, any failure to meet the pesticide reduction target will have potentially irreversible long-term effects on food security in the future, the statement adds.
The EC stated that its response to Member States “suggests possible ways to further reduce the administrative burden on farmers and to consider the development of alternatives to chemical pesticides”. “There is more room for action to accelerate the introduction of alternatives to the market and maintain the overall positive trend. This includes continuing to ensure that the most dangerous and chemical pesticides are used only as a last resort.”
“Continuously” applying the principles of integrated pest management and obtaining independent advice on their implementation, as provided for in the draft EC legislation, “Farmers can reduce their dependence on chemical pesticides without jeopardizing the profitability of their businesses”. The Community Manager also noted that, according to data released by the European Commission this Wednesday, Member States have made “significant progress” towards achieving the targets set out in the legislative proposal.
already shrinking
Brussels, across the EU for 2021 The use of chemical pesticides was reduced by 33% and the use of the most dangerous pesticides by 21%.. “As the EU moves in the right direction towards achieving its targets of 50% reduction in the use and risk of chemical pesticides and the most hazardous pesticides by 2030, there is still much work to be done,” he said.
Following the publication of the impact analysis, the European Federation of Wines of Indicated Origin, the Assembly of European Wine Regions, the European Confederation of Independent Wine Growers and the Committee of Community Agricultural Organizations and Cooperatives expressed their “deep concern” in a joint statement. . for the future of the wine industry.
For these organizations, the approach derived from the results of the Commission’s analysis is “It worries about the future of the industry and shows a complete disregard for what European viticulture means.”.
“The European wine industry aspires to be an actor in the ecological transition that must be done in a sustainable way, without compromising the future of this industry and the European wine regions, for the benefit of competitors from third countries who do not comply. sanitary standards according to them,” they said. Therefore, “European decision-makers develop a realistic action plan taking into account the time required to find and implement effective alternative solutions for the use of phytosanitary products”.
……
Contact address of the environment department: [email protected]