Not even the Polish Prime Minister, Mateusz Morawieckinor that of Hungary, Victor OrbanThey accept the agreement on the distribution of refugees, which was closed at the beginning of the month by the interior ministers of the European Union, which will mean the forced displacement of 30,000 people a year, and they are benefiting from this year’s summit. They are in Brussels on Thursday and Friday to show their most unequivocal opposition to a decision they insist must be passed by the Council. Heads of State and Government by qualified majority but not unanimous vote of ministers. When the Polish president arrived at the European Council calling for the reform of the Frontex agency, “We have an alternative plan, we have a plan for secure European borders.”
“I will propose a plan called ‘Europe of safe borders’. Europe with secure borders is not about illegal immigration, economic sanctions—the immigration deal includes paying 20,000 euros for every unrecognized refugee—not waiving the rule of consensus. And yes to sovereignty, yes to security, yes to the security of Polish borders, Polish streets, Polish cities and towns, but also to all our European friends,” he said. Distribution of refugees decided by qualified majority at the beginning of the month and opposition only Hungary And Poland Refusing to take refugees “by force”.
This is one of the most divisive topics in Twenty-Seven. immigration crisis of 2015 Although it was closed apriori at the beginning of the month, satisfying most of the capital from Berlin to Rome. According to some European leaders, the next step should be to formalize partnership agreements with third countries. “The head of the commission talks about the need to consider, along with other plans, cooperation with third countries and ways to avoid dying in the Mediterranean. Therefore, when we talk about the possibility of (establishing) asylum procedures in safe third countries, we must rethink our cooperation with third countries.” Karl Nehammer In a letter addressed to the European Commission by a dozen countries last February, it demanded that billboards be financed with European funds.
Agreement with Tunisia
This is a field of work to strengthen cooperation with third countries and is supported by all European governments listed below. Association agreement negotiated by the EU with Tunisia Germany’s chancellor said it’s a way to strengthen border management, search and rescue operations and the fight against the mafia, and legally attract immigration because “we need workers with different capacities”. Olaf Schölz. The draft results are of the view that such agreements are “mutually beneficial” as they will aid the country’s economic development, encourage investment, trade and the energy transition, and commit to developing similar agreements with other countries in the region.
The new €12,000 million item for migration, proposed by the European Commission as part of the review of the European budget framework for 2024-2027, makes more of a difference. It’s a “good starting point” for countries like Italy because we “need money” to solve the immigration problem, not only to strengthen borders, but also to cooperate with countries like Tunisia. Others, such as Hungary, firmly refuse to raise fewer items and less budgets for immigration, as this would mean supporting the arrival of irregular migrants, according to Orban.