This Court of Alicante sentenced a teenager to five years in prison for attempted murder, who was charged with attempting to kill a man by running over him with his car in Villena. Defendant was defended by his lawyers Moisés Candela Sabater and Mari Paz Alarcón must compensate the victim with 15,000 Euros for injuries and sequelae, According to the sentence given by Chapter Three. According to the court’s decision, the victim’s anger led to the assault, either because of a dispute in an occupied home, as the victim said, or because the defendant asked his wife for money for drugs. the accused has been away from the victim for ten years.
This Investigation and private prosecution, lawyer Luis Miguel Cartagena At trial, they demanded 9 and 12 years in prison on behalf of the victim, but the court failed to prove that he had hit the man with a bat or baseball bat after the hit-and-run. He also reduced his sentence taking into account. high quality mitigating damage repair to have Sent 15,000 Euros on the judicial account before the trial.
Finished
The facts declared to be proven took place on February 7, 2022, at around 1:20 pm in the San Francisco de Asís neighborhood of Villena. The defendant, who was 25 at the time of the incident, threw the vehicle “unexpectedly” at a man riding a bicycle on the sidewalk while driving at high speed in the neighborhood in question.
According to the sentence, the accused he thought about ending his life or at least he was aware of the high probability of killing the man he had “violently” crushed. Car He stepped onto the pavement and was stopped after hitting a tree.. The court did not prove that the defendant then got out of his vehicle and began hitting the victim with a stick or baseball bat.
The oppressed man suffered trauma and bruises and after spending two days in intensive care wounds took four months to healalthough there are some sequels.
distraction
At the hearing, the accused denied the facts and said it was a distraction, but at the oral hearing he admitted that the victim had come to his house on the morning of the attack to ask him for money, and He got angry”.
The victim stated that he was on the street while riding his bicycle. “I heard some acceleration” and he felt the blow that threw him to the ground. The oppressed man denied having any problems with the defendant, but stated that they had an inconsistency with an occupied house, which both objected.
reports Local Police and Civil Guard They concluded that the abuse was intentional, and the Court dismissed the now convicted person’s alleged error.
with regard to aggression baseball bat or bat, The court did not consider this to be proven and noted that the hit-and-run incident alone would explain the victim’s injuries.
According to the court, there was betrayal in the anger and the following statements were included in the decision: attack was behind and the victim goes undetected. According to the sentence, the accused wanted to cause the death of the man, or at least accepted this result.