A person who is a director and majority shareholder of a company, alcohol company dedicated art trade He denied that it was credited to him at a hearing in Alicante on Tuesday. Tables with a value exceeding 680,000 euros and assured that the company had to shut down in 2008 due to the crisis and used some of the paintings. payment suppliers Who did the society owe? Regarding the remaining jobs, he confirmed that he kept them in his own company. the girl childMoreover processed with receiptand many were damaged by a faecal water flood on the ship they were left on. Others, according to the accused, were jobs that his daughter’s firm had bought back from suppliers.
The trial will continue this Wednesday. Tenth Division of the Alicante Court and the prosecution first demands that the businessman be imprisoned. four and a half years in prison for their crimes embezzlement and unfair corporate governance, for his daughter, he seeks two years in prison for the crime of accepting the works, according to the public charge, for putting the works for sale even though he knows they are illegal.
Including several former associates of the accused businessman nephew of the accusedThey are also pursuing private prosecution in the case and upheld their grievances against the company executive who invited them to leave the company in October 2008 as they declared.
Prosecutor’s accusation
according to the accusation against InvestigationThe events occurred between November 2008 and December 2008, when the accused ordered the transfer. illustrated works to the headquarters of his daughter’s company in Alcoy“Without the knowledge and authorization of other partners of the company.”
According to the prosecutor, who believes that the accused presented the annual accounts of 2007 and 2008 at the court, the value of the works was more than 680,000 euros. Trade Registry, with a “fantasy content” that will harm other partners. According to the defendant, this valuation was not genuine and had been placed in the accounts to show that he had an interest in the bank.
The defendant explained at the hearing that the company, consisting of five partners, “had come to a dead end in 2008” due to the crisis and despite having a good customer portfolio. “Banks turned off the taps” and the company was closed at the end of 2008 due to non-payment. While the three former partners stated that the defendants had fired them from the company, the manager stated that there was a meeting in October 2008 and told him that they were leaving. They left the company because they couldn’t get along with my “management”.
loans
The defendant explained that he should have asked by now. three bank loans He sold his house to obtain liquidity for his art company and eventually to pay off those debts. He also stated that he called the suppliers with debts and offered the opportunity to deliver. pictures in exchange for payment of debts and so he did.
Daughter who is a painter and “He was the first person I fired as an example”, created another similar company, which now appears as civil liability in the case. A few former partners also founded another firm dedicated to the same industry.
A fourth partner, not prosecuting privately, was charged by the defendant in 2008 of 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 120.000 €however, his fate was never learned and this person stated at the hearing that he did not know what had happened to the paintings in question.
This Businessman’s daughter denied accusation reception and he declared that his father left him pictures in warehouse in your company.
A former assistant pointed out that “thousands of paintings were lost”, and another “There were paintings that would pay half of Spain”. However, there was no “extensive” inventory of all stock at the time the company was closed.