youtuber Daniel Santomemore commonly known asDallas Reviewit happened He was ordered by the Barcelona court to pay 12,000 euros in damages to his ex-wife’s father., but also ‘impressive’ Miare for violating his dignity and image. Decision announced by ‘eldiario.es’ details Dalas unfairly insulted the girl’s fathercall him “Malicious” and “Damn Attacker”. The penalty includes monetary compensation, as well as measures related to the YouTube channel, which has more than ten million followers. He was ordered to remove nine videos in which he insulted the father, and to post up to four videos reading his conviction in the same narrative and style that he insulted.
Daniel Santomé started his career as a youtuber over a decade ago and initially focused on video game related content. In recent years, she has come to the fore in her confrontations with other influencers, public debates, and reactions to third-party videos. He gained international fame by participating in the launch of a video game called Fur Fun, which had to be removed from the Steam platform due to its poor quality. At the same time accused of sexual harassment by an underage followerAlthough he requested 5 years in prison, he was acquitted during the judicial process, where the prosecutor’s office did not object to the acquittal.
On a personal level, ‘youtuber’ If you have an open conflict with your ex-partner, The ‘streamer’ María Rubio, known as Miare’s Project. One of the points of contention has been the dog Argos, whom they both have in common and whom Justice orders Santomé to return. In this regard, The Dalas Review published a series of videos in which his ex-wife directly insulted his father, which cost him a year. 12,000 euros in prison for defaming his honor and image. The father of the ‘pennant’ was represented in this case by attorney David Bravo.
Sue
The lawsuit filed by the father of the young ‘influencer’ in questionA total of nine videos broadcast on n Dallas Review channel, with over ten million followers. In these videos, the ‘youtuber’ referred to the plaintiff as an ‘abuse’, a ‘shit attacker’, a ‘sick cowardly patient’ and described his family as a ‘family of criminals’. He further stated, among other accusations, that the father liked to hit defenseless women in the street, referring to an incident involving the dog.
Investigation court number five in Barcelona decided to punish the Dalas Review on the grounds that Miare’s Project violated both his father’s honor and image. This “social relevance” of “youtuber” followed by “thousands of teens”has attached importance to insults that are not within the scope of freedom of expression according to its provision. The sentence emphasizes that the disagreement between the parties is not just an increase in tension due to the uploading of the videos over time.