are “two conflicting versions”, Since a 16-year-old girl testified in Episode One yesterday Provincial Court Zaragosa your neighbor on the second floor On the descent of his house, he unsuccessfully jumped on her to try to kiss her. In parallel, the defendant -GCM- had given assurances that he was completely unaware of the events recently attributed to him and requested by the Prosecutor’s Office. one year in prison alleged perpetrator of sexual assault.
The facts in question May 31, 2021 in Delicias neighborhood Zaragosa, when the defendant and the minor coincide on the portal of the apartment in which they both reside. “He passed in front of me, he greeted me, and I was looking at the mailbox. I went up the stairs, he was behind me,” recalls the accused from the dock with amazement and adds: “I opened the door of the house, closed the door and nothing else happened. I took a shower and when I got out, my family said that they were crying and searching the house.” justified the prosecution.
But, Contrary to what he had previously declared at the Investigation Court responsible for conducting the investigation, the alleged victim stated that he was the one in front as they both climbed the stairs. “I turned to say goodbye, but she threw herself forward as if she wanted to kiss me,” said the young woman, who thought she remembered not getting the kiss. While answering the prosecutor’s questions, his brother confirmed that his brother was also climbing the stairs behind the accused.
In this sense, the defense attorney Olga Oseira He defended his client’s acquittal. “Important details that cannot be contradicted”. “Going before and after is not the same thing. The authorship has not been proven and does not have sufficient credibility,” the lawyer said.