victim gender violence related to Ibiza complaint lasting more than ten months The island’s Court of Violence Against Women is pending a hearing, which should determine the definitive detention and visitation regime for her two underage children; has not yet been punished. Moreover, sorry for not getting an answer regarding the status of your file.
The woman emphasizes that this delay is related to the fact that the time has passed. more than two years since the sentence was approved conviction against ex-spouse (December 2020) and emotional exhaustion, implying that he is still awaiting due process and there is no definitive guardianship regime.
HE legal journey The complainant’s trial begins in October 2019, when the child custody case was heard. On 26 November 2019, the Ibiza 5th Court of First Instance decided on the provisional conditions for the custody of the children jointly with the ex-spouse. These conditions (including custody of him, the father’s visitation regime without overnight stay and a joint child support of 150 euros per child) are still in force at this time, although they are only temporary in nature. .
In parallel, it ran criminal process against your ex-spouse for mistreatment. The aggressor – on January 17, 2020, the terms of the Ibiza 2nd judgments – when the file was sent to the Court of Violence Against Women in Ibiza, which should resolve the custody regime of the children and the details of visits and care.
Processing delay
This court held the hearing to establish definitive detention and visitation measures. 16 June 2022, as communicated to him on May 9 of the same year and has not yet been disclosed. After the 2nd High Criminal Court convicted his ex-wife of domestic violence and the file was transferred from the Social Court to the Court of Violence Against Women, the complainant cannot make sense of this delay. criminal conviction.
The lawyer for this abuse victim explains that he has been dealing with the situation where documents related to the case were found on several occasions. But they claim they ignored this information from the court. “Ten months later, no one knows anythingand the folder with my history must be somewhere. On a desk, in a drawer, in a filing cabinet… This needs to be resolved,” the complainant expressed angrily.
The woman explains that she suffered an emotional breakdown complicated by the delay in the judicial decision, and therefore she continues to appeal. psychological attention Provided by the Donut Office. “It’s preventing you from turning the page,” it says.
Her desire, as she put it, is to see the process end and put an end to the uncertainty of waiting to learn about the guardianship regime that will affect her and her children. On the other hand, it also highlights: economic cost which means handling the process from the end of 2019.
Likewise, the complainant is concerned that the publication of the sentence may be delayed until it coincides with the beginning of the case. holiday period In justice, he thinks it could add a few more months to his delay. “I see that September will come and we will continue in the same situation,” she says.