Second statement from former football player Dani Alves, who was arrested for alleged rape 23 year old girl in the disco bath sutton Arriving from Barcelona on the night of December 30, 2022, the player began charting the new course of his defense, which revolved around consent. This Monday, he admitted that he had lied so far, claiming he was obsessed with hiding from his wife that he was unfaithful, and finally admitted it was penetration. This last statement fits the DNA analysis. However, contrary to the version that the victim has always defended, the actress has not yet clarified how the young woman injured her knee or why her footprints were found in the sink or bathroom cistern.
It was on television when Alves first spoke publicly about her sexual assault complaint. He was in Antena 3 days before he was arrested. He later claimed that he did not recognize the girl and that he did not need to know that the bathroom was full when he opened the door, implying that she entered first.
Cameras cornered him
Sutton’s surveillance footage destroyed that first version. Alves and sacrifice VIP table accessed As he claimed twice through the waiter, the football player danced for a quarter of an hour after which, according to the footage, Alves entered a private room with a bathroom. A minute later, the young woman went to the private room. Knowing that he lied on that video sent to Antena 3, Mossos arrested Alves on January 20 and took him to Ciutat de la Justícia.
In his first official statement before investigating magistrate 15 in Barcelona, Alves again lied: this time, he stated that the victim entered the toilet after him, but remained there -16 minutes doing nothing. while defecating. The prosecution, the lawyer for the special prosecution, and the judge himself—who replaced the president, who questioned Alves this Monday—remembered, among other things, that the science police had found him. cum on the ground. The actor then tried the third version, following what was said before and without removing the part he had defecated from. hands-on blowjob.
DNA results
This forensic statement by Alves took place before DNA was identified from the remains of semen that the science police had collected on the floor of Sutton’s bathroom, with a sample of the victim’s dress, underwear, and intravaginal semen. In fact, it was the day Alves agreed to hand over his DNA for the contrast to be performed. Hours after deposition and sample collection, the judge decided to send him to preventive prison – this decision, Barcelona audience because he also estimated there was a risk of escape given his economic capacity – he argued there was “far more evidence than needed”.
Alves, already in jail, hired a lawyer Christopher Martell. And the DNA results came in: semen was his. The final version, oral sex, was also wrong because it didn’t explain how the semen got into the victim’s vagina. Martell went to work.
new version
This Monday’s statement began with Alves’s statement that lasted about 15 minutes. He then answered questions from all parties. In this fourth version directed by Martell, how could it be otherwise, Alves admitted it was penetration, but He insisted that he agreed.
He said there was mutual sexual attraction in the previous minutes they shared at his desk in Sutton and he offered to finish it off in the private room. Regarding what happened in the bathroom, Alves said that she sat on the toilet, knelt in front of him and had oral sex, and then sat on it and entered it.
Bathroom interior signs
The victim, on the other hand, never changed his version. Here’s how: He agreed to follow Alves to the private room that night because he repeatedly asked him to do so. Not knowing where he was going, he entered the bathroom and when he learned that there was a sink, he wanted to get out, but Alves prevented him by closing the door. Alves sat on the toilet, forced her to sit on it, and then pushed him to the floor. Next, slapped her, grabbed her by the neck and pressured her to give him a blowjob that he didn’t do. Then he picked it up again and pushed it towards the bathroom sink. Finally he put it across the toilet and got up and went inside and ejaculated. Alves asked him to wait a few seconds before leaving.
This version of the victim coincided with the evidence later found by Mossos: Alves’ semen in an intravaginal sample, the scratch on the knee that appeared on the medical report, and also Fingerprints were found in the bathroom. Scientific police counted the victim’s seven fingerprints in Sutton’s bathroom and none of Alves’s. According to the legal sources this newspaper consulted, the footprints of the complainant were on the sink, wall and toilet.
On the other hand, this last statement of Alves is that the complainant bent down just to perform oral sex or –If the woman’s postures were as she described– how the fingerprints got to these three places.