Investigation Judge number 26 of Madrid only assistant inspector National Police Responsible for the police operation on March 22, 2021 six agents broke into a house all of Madrid Pandemic stop an illegal party.
This was noted in a car that Europa Press had access to and that the judge was in. charges against other agents investigated for break-ins At the prosecutor’s request, the Judge understands that the facts attributed to these agents are not criminal.
On March 22, 2021, when MZ was at home with some of his friends, at around 01:30, 6 agents went to the apartment and found that there were signs of crime, and besides ringing the bell, he shouted “Police open the door”.
When there was no response to the orders of the representatives, they continued to “open the entrance door of the house using the sliding method, with the agents entering the house without the consent of the resident.”
The tenant was represented by attorney Juan Gonzalo Ospina. committed the crime of disobedience His client, about whom an investigation was launched, made the first accusation of trespassing. home immunity offense. The Madrid County Court justified the lawyer’s refusal for contempt in a car dated October 2021.
For reasons unrelated to the procedure, the tenant has decided to live outside of Spain and has now decided to withdraw the charge against the police officers after the accusation by the prosecution.
The lawsuit began after a lawsuit was filed against the tenant of the property for alleged insubordination, and statement dropped from trespassing on agents after the tenant’s complaint
This situation occurred one day after the events this led to another criminal case, which will be prosecuted against six agents of the National Police for trespassing on Lagasca street in the capital.
Last October, the judge agreed to turn the trial into a trial before a jury court. Understands that the cases on trial may constitute an trespassing crime.
In November, the police officers requested the revocation of the order to reverse the trial. and the order in which the complaint was accepted, considering that their rights had been violated without knowing the charge placed on them.