HE civil servants union CSIFThe majority in the Administration of Justice, called sort out situation created with Strike by lawyers of the Ministry of Justice (LAJ) before the critical situation in which the courts find themselves, after six weeks of strike. The CSIF expressed its concern that the indefinite strike was already protracted, “because of its great societal importance, approach with dialogue leading to its solution without further delay”. In the opinion of this union, one of the things at issue “ rights and freedoms of citizens and one already frayed economy Due to the effects of the pandemic, whose recovery is also closely related to the reliability and proper functioning of the Justice Administration”. As the collective begins a new negotiation with the Ministry of Justice this Monday, follow rate in the province Alicante he is a 78.8 percent follow-up.
“Because it respects the exercise of the right to strike, CSIF requires that the parties involved in the conflict reach a compromise and find a solution to an increasingly deepening problem and what caused it in this way. It exacerbates the critical situation of the Justice Administration., they provided. For CSIF, “if anything is proven, it is The functional distribution in judicial bodies does not meet the needs of modern administration.“, because many functions of the LAJ are “delegated and executed daily by the general bodies of the Administration of Justice (Procedural and Administrative Administration, Procedural and Administrative Operations and Legal Aid), therefore without any recognition”.
“Therefore, we consider completely Unjustified suspension of a trial due to the absence of the LAJ Since 2009 and at the request of the LAJ (they were known as forensic secretaries at the time) they were exempted from the requirement to enter the room“, they emphasized this unity.
suspension of trials
The CSIF considered that “some issues that are not true and unfortunately considered true need to be clarified”. One of them is to say that the LAJ has no scope for negotiation, “according to the existing regulations (the Organic Law on Union Freedom, a continuation of Article 31 and the Consolidated Text of the Public Servants’ Basic Statutes), there is de facto negotiation space)”. They also denied the LAJs’ claim that the judiciary did 90% of their work. “It is a false and unfair statement to other employees of the judicial office. As stated before, it should not be forgotten; Many functions of the LAJ are delegated and/or carried out daily by the general bodies of the Justice Administration. therefore without any recognition” they said.
The CSIF recognizes the reorganization of functions within the judiciary and its recognition of labor and wages as “a further refinement of procedures judicial. We must not lose sight of the fact that we are now faced with the paradox of complaints about slow justice. the same transaction goes to signature thirty or forty times. Procedures, which in most cases are procedural decisions”.
For all this, “We ask CSIF for a resolution to the conflict by taking a starting point. December 2021 union contract. An agreement that is a good starting point for CSIF to address the implementation of better working conditions, from population groups to guards in transit for career or productivityIn the context of organizational and functional change that will one day come and contribute to better public service delivery for the benefit of the citizen, while at the same time honoring all Justice personnel by tapping into and appreciating their potential. business and paper in the courthouses,” they concluded.