This conviction review crimes against sexual freedom continue and Part Seven of the Elche-based Trial, decided less than inside two years and six months in prison punishments for two rapists in enforcement of what is known as the “only yes is yes” law. According to forensic sources, in any case, none of them will be released from prison. The beneficiaries of the new law are convicted persons. sexually harassing a daughter in Elche and a man found guilty Rape of a young woman in Bigastro.
The court sentenced the accused to 13 years and 6 months in prison for continuing the sexual abuse of one of his daughters and was reduced with the amendment made to the “only yes is yes” law. within two years and six months. This reduction was appealed by the Elche Prosecutor’s Office. According to judicial sources, this detainee was acquitted of abusing another girl for lack of evidence in the same case, and was tried in another case for molesting the third girl he was with. infected with papilloma virusalthough he was acquitted.
Two sexual assault crimes
The second sentence was revised downward at the minister’s request. defense attorney, José Soler Martinrefers to a 33-year-old man who was sentenced to a total of 20 years and six months in prison in 2019 for two counts of sexual assault and one injury. The 7-year prison sentence, one of the penalties for being a collaborator in the crime of sexual assault, continues if the Elche Court finds that the investigation is inappropriate, while for the other crime, he is sentenced to 13 years in prison. sexual assault with penetration and joint performance The prison sentence was reduced from 13 years to ten years and six months.
During the same investigation, the ban on approaching and communicating with the victim was lowered on this convict. The sentence set the ban at 30 years and is now set at 15 years and 6 months. The rape occurred during a birthday celebration in July 2006. La Pedrera reservoir in Bigastro. A minor raped the minor while holding his neck and covering his mouth so that the minor would not scream, then the accused sexually harassed him and benefited from the reduction of the accused’s sentence of nearly three years.