On October 19, a long-awaited TVE format made its return to the broadcasting world, drawing attention from fans of late-night games and competition shows. The collaboration featured Twitch streamer TheGrefg alongside a lineup of well-known participants, a pairing many viewers hoped would recapture the magic of previous seasons. Yet the relaunch did not land as hoped. Viewers flooded social networks with critiques, voicing disappointment over how the revival was executed and received by the audience.
Among the critics was a prominent host who participated as a guest on the night of the premiere. Mayra Gomez Kemp, a seasoned presence in the show’s universe, did not mince words as she assessed the return. The episode, which sampled an audience around sixty thousand, left a mark in the online conversation as viewers weighed the decisions behind the format’s contemporary edit and pacing. The remarks appeared in a feature for La Razón, where the host explained her reasons for attending and then detailed several missteps she observed on set. The article conveys a backstage perspective, highlighting the mismatch between expectations and the actual production experience.
The guest recounts that she agreed to appear after being invited by Alejandro, the son of a former central figure connected with the program’s history. Upon arrival, however, the atmosphere and workflow did not align with what she anticipated. She describes being directed to a corner of the set and facing practical gaps, such as an absence of warm beverages and a lack of a clear plan for the segment. These operational gaps contributed to a perception of disorganization during the shoot.
Mayra Gomez Kemp explains that she left the studio frustrated by the overall setup. She emphasizes a deep affection for the show, which intensified the sense of disappointment when the experience did not meet that long-standing expectation. The lack of a coherent script and a clear sense of purpose for her on-screen role left her with an impression that the production environment had not been properly prepared. Her reflections suggest that future installments could struggle if the same issues persist and if the production team does not establish a clear direction for guests and segments.
The writer notes that the absence of Chicho Ibáñez Serrador’s guiding influence loomed large in observers’ eyes. His legacy looms over the franchise, and his absence was felt as a missing touchstone for the format. The piece characterizes the late creator as a benchmark of precision, implying that without that standard, some viewers worry about the continuity and quality of upcoming episodes. The implication is that a different approach may be required to regain the trust and enthusiasm of loyal fans.
Despite the mixed reception, the night did carry moments of connection. Mayra Gomez Kemp acknowledges a notably emotional reunion with colleagues who were part of the show in earlier years. That moment stood out as a bright note amid the broader conversation about the reboot. It offered a glimpse of the camaraderie and history that still resonate with those who grew up watching the program and carried the show’s legacy into newer generations. The response to the reunion was positive, underscoring how nostalgia can briefly counterbalance criticisms about format and execution. The overall narrative remains a reminder that revivals often walk a fine line between honoring the past and meeting contemporary audience expectations.