This Comptes Syndicate questioning the privilege. 2,300 out of 43,000 Help and support for covid that Labora gave to companies and self-employed in the Community of Valencia last year recommends reviewing them to ensure that the requirements set in the call are met. by the supervisory authority inspection report The Community of Valencia – formerly Servef – runs the subsidies given last year by the public employment and education service, and also lack of control Generalitat’s General Intervention or Lack of definition of criteria for approval of aid this, he says, occurs in certain programs.
The criticisms they rejected Workwhere they already guaranteed it files reviewed and they are just Real mistakes in 52 of them.
Criticisms of Sindicatura refer to the help Labora has summoned as part of the measures. tackling the consequences of covid and especially sectors most affected by the restrictions applied to stop the pandemic, such as the hotel industry, hotels, travel agencies and other artistic and leisure activities, therefore concessions limited to certain CNAEs (codes reflecting the activity in which a company or self-employed person is registered). They were approved in total 43,152 grants totaling 50.6 million Euros.
However data migration A study conducted by Sindicatura revealed that up to 2,289 beneficiaries would receive 1,376,700 benefits free of charge or more than they were due. This is because these subsidies are requested from petitioners on a responsible statement and then the district Administration has to verify the accuracy of the data with the information sent to them by Social Security and in these cases either the CNAE does not respond. one of the suitable ones or did not appear.
After receiving communication from Sindicatura, which took place prior to the publication of the report, they assure from Labora that: These records have been reviewed and they are just real errors in 52 casesthat has been carried out to changeAccording to this organization’s Director of Planning and Services, eva hernandeZ. Hernández, as stated in their claims to the Buyer, three criteria to verify that these self-employed workers and companies are eligible for assistance. On the one hand, it continued Check IAE the petitioner and whether it coincides with a CNAE similar to one envisioned in the call. On the other hand, in cases where the financial domicile is out of autonomy, Workers hired in the community. And finally, that the CNAE of the company or the self-employed does not coincide with any of the ones on the list, but CNAE where your employees are registered if it was part of the activities that could get help – which might be different.
But they think from the Buyer that the only criterion that can be valid is the second, because the first two are “Although they are considered reasonable, they are not expressly provided for in the regulatory decree for subsidies.That’s why they keep recommending a review of the files. They also draw attention to the existence of 104 self-employed cases that are not even registered with the SGK.
lack of control
Beyond this call, the report “significant violations“Beginning with the Generalitat General Response not properly exercising financial control of this activity, in the management of subsidies by Labora, something that can actually be attributed to the regional Treasury department.
On the other hand, it makes sure that the employment service does not send job-related information. Deals over 600.000 Euro nor did it send a certified list of a number of agreements signed last year. The order for these contracts to be recorded in the computer system requested by the Buyer 20 December 2021, so they think the time to sign up is 2022. In addition, they ensure that all information is submitted to the Generalitat’s register of agreements, where they can be consulted.
In another setting, the Recipient may also meet the evaluation criteria for granting financial assistance. “customized training” – Subsidies for companies to train the unemployed according to their needs with a commitment to hire them later – not “explicitly defined”. A shortcoming that Labora once again denies and attributes the inspector’s reluctance to the inspector. special features and the complexity of such a grant.
Finally, the report also considers a violation. employment workshopsor do not include one backup list “Demands that were initially positively assessed and could not be addressed at that time due to lack of budget were duly decided upon later as a result of a larger budget allocation or waiver of subsidies granted”. In this regard, Labora’s director of Planning and Services states that in principle he did not envisage a larger donation and was later expanded and expanded with it. managed to meet all requests, therefore none were rejected and the list was not required.