this Court of Santa Cruz de Tenerife Sentenced Abraham ZA to 24 years in prison for the treacherous murder of his partner, Ramona JSA, with particular cruelty and aggravating factors such as kinship and gender violence.: He poured gasoline on it and set it on fire.
Last week the popular jury delivered its verdict of guilty, and now the convicted person faces a 10-year suspension to pay 75,000 euros each to the decedent’s two daughters and succumb to grief. During this time, you will not be able to approach them within 500 meters.
The incidents took place at a house in Bursa at around 03:30 on September 23, 2020. urbanization Princess Iballa of La Laguna.
At that moment a fierce argument broke out, and then the man set fire to the victim, who would die at 11:45 the next day. Canary Islands University Hospital (HUC).
mood to cause death
According to the verdict of the jury a week ago, the accused acted with the intent to cause his death, and for this he put him in a bathtub, sprayed gasoline on him and set him on fire.
As a result victim suffered second and third degree burns on 85% of his body and internal injuries due to inhalation of smoke and heat.
this judgment he considers that the accused’s murder consciously proves that he is unable to resist, as the woman is physically stronger and is alone at home, preventing her from making any defense.
The sentence reads, “The man chose to burn her with the intent to kill her, knowing that it had caused him terrible suffering and deliberately and unnecessarily increasing both physical and mental suffering to complete his death,” the sentence reads.
Proven coexistence
In addition, the accused maintains the affective and coexistence relationship with the victim and treats the victim in a humiliating and humiliating way, constantly supports, nurtures, He allowed her to live in his house and therefore had to obey him..
In this way he placed it somewhere. vile role and, as the neighbors have heard several times, do not give in to your partner if he does not comply with his wishes.
this judgment He describes the evidence against Ibrahim as “overwhelming” because he himself has partially accepted the facts, there are testimonies of his aggressive character and the unbearable and contradictory neighborhood coexistence with constant fights with other residents of the building.
“He lacked minimal hygiene, and the shouts and insults he played that night and the days before were constant. victim even in the moments after setting it on fire”, stated in the decision.
flare
It was precisely the fire that alarmed the neighbors who came to the apartment. then hearing the victim ask for help and contemplating her “terrible” situation, to the point where witnesses admitted “the horror of seeing her with her hair burnt, no eyebrows, her torso exposed in a melted silicone bra, nipple and burnt breasts”.
Meanwhile, neighbors and police officers they heard the woman shout that the man wanted to kill her, set her on fire and for this purpose put her in the bathtub, sprayed her with gasoline and set it on fire.
Meanwhile, the defendant kept a cold-blooded attitude and asked him to shut up and say that it was all an accident.
this documentary evidenceGraphics, visual inspections of the ground, traces collected and analyzed, or autopsy are evidence that the judge considers “sufficient evidential material” to conclude his crime.
One of the most controversial aspects is whether they really form a couple. The defendant always refused..
aggravating factors
On the contrary, in defective It has been determined that “the moral relationship that binds the accused and the deceased victim to each other is the cause of the crime” and made it necessary to apply the aggravating kinship situation.
this gender aggravating factor It is based on the “degrading and humiliating treatment he treated her”, and this was revealed once again when Ramona said she wanted to be registered with the defendant’s home, which the defendant vehemently denied.
this jury It was denied that the man was acting under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or that he suffered from a personality disorder despite suffering from various mental pathologies, taking drugs and attempting at least one suicide.
The defendant’s statement that it was he who sprayed himself with gasoline was never believed. caught fire when he went to the kitchen to buy a beer.