A Bank clerk Who was fired when it turned out to be?and had seized 8,335 euros He admitted that the district manager was the perpetrator, but claimed in his defense that it was due to his attraction to shopping, an impulse he couldn’t avoid.
This was reflected in the sentence awarded by the Social Court of Cartagena, which declared that it had been proven to work. very serious flawJustifying the source of his dismissal agreed in July 2021.
The decision states that the expert who participated in the trial in order to present his conclusions regarding the personality of the worker did not prove that the will and judgment power of the worker disappeared. was responsible for his actions. “The court says that the purchase is likely to be compulsory, he cannot stop doing it, but that does not take away his ability to know that the way to provide him with the necessary money for the purchase is not right.”
And he adds that he did not convey this dependency to the company, so he missed the opportunity to assign or assign another task to himself. resort to a later incompetence.
The bank employee claimed that he went to the bank. mental health center trying to fight those compulsive urges to buy.