this Supreme Court (TS) Confirmed 3.5 years in prison To a man from Pamplona 100,000 euro cheat to an eighth-year-old who had a stroke years ago, had a disability and cheated with fake investments from a Seychelles-based company. The defendant had already been convicted of fraud in 2014.
The old man came to withdraw this money in cash from his bank account and allocated this money to investments that the accused had guaranteed him. 5% monthly interest payment, without actually taking the money. The convict also falsified documents from financial institutions to gain his credibility and pretended to be the person in charge of a construction company in Pamplona to support the said scam.
The defendant had previously been convicted in court. Second Part of the Trial, a phrase already sanctioned by the TSJN. Now the Supreme Court is returning to the decision in the same vein and rejecting the appeal because “there was cheating before, because the accused made some offers to an elderly person for profit. excessive interest on an investment that misleads you and motivated the patrimonial displacement of their money”.
Born in 1930, the victim of the swindler had a certain relationship with a hotelier from Pamplona. Aware of the old man’s stroke and disgusted with his damaging investments in the stock market, this acquaintance put him in contact with a friend. Their relationship started when he was a language teacher and his friend left him a place to teach. So he presented it as an investment manager and was none other than the defendant. The hotel operator was also tried and acquitted of mediation at that time.
5% monthly interest
The sentence highlights the cognitive limitations of the defendant that he learned the victim’s profile through his friend, and that he also wanted to obtain a higher return on capital as a result of the vascular accident he experienced. Thus, he “made a plan to gain his trust and give him as much money as possible with no intention of giving it back.” For this purpose, he took it to different properties in Pamplona, stating that it belonged to him, showed him the public works he said was done by the construction company, showed his deeds and took him to eat at various restaurants.
In accordance with the plan, he offered him a loan investment where he would receive 5% (Euro 2,500) monthly interest and the intermediary hotelier would witness the operation. Firstly, He withdrew 50,000 Euros from the victim’s bank and the defendant signed a contract on behalf of an international holding company in Seychelles, of which he was the manager. Later, the victim sought more guarantees to invest another 50,000 euros, and the accused fabricated a false document from an Italian organization to give the operation a more credible appearance. He reinvested in January 2016 and was paid no amount in return.
The decision also confirms that the 100,000 euros, which the old man claims to be his only possessions, need the amounts invested for rent, food and his house, and that he needs the help of a person due to his advanced age. home stuff.