all charges against Marta Calvo case they met again: presented two separate briefings to TSJ, one after the other, and appealed against the appeal of the lawyer of Jorge Ignacio Palma Jacome, who was alleged serial killer in these cases, and went to the Valencia high court to seek his client’s acquittal. other things that yours has been violated presumption of innocence or lack of an adequate assessment of the evidencesomething the TSJ cannot do again in any case, since this ensures that the verdict is set according to the law, since the trial court, i.e. the people’s jury, and the magistrate who presided over it, have jurisdiction.
One of the specific charges brought by Juan Carlos Navarro on behalf of two of the deadly victims, the Lady Marcela Vargas and Arliene Ramos, and six of the eight survivors, in his defiance of the defence, discredits the absence of case law in the case. his thread argument before the high court.
Both that part and Marta Calvo’s mother’s accusations in the figure of Pilar Jové; the father of the young woman (former judge Baltasar Garzón), represented by the Ilocad office; and the other two survivors, through their lawyers – Isabel Carricondo and Vicente Escribano – remind him step by step why, in his view, the presumption of innocence was never violated, but rather why the evidence presented at the trial was evidence that destroyed them. enough to make the jury consider Palma guilty of all crimes.
In addition, the survivor defended by Isabel Carricondo is to her letter, the lawyer from Ilocad who claimed in their appeals and both Jové and Navarro of Levante-EMV and took up the case.