Accused, 50 years and initials PFRaskedor a second time and almost a year after going to jail, conditional release with to listen Zamora repeats for this has not committed any crime against the sexual freedom of the complainants., the accused and his two daughters are receiving psychological treatment for the events they claim to have experienced while they were on vacation as friends. She argues that it seems that everything is a conspiracy to harm herself and make money.
The County Court had already rejected it. in September 2022 same request for protect the “safety and peace of minors” his company may be affected by the release of the industrialist based in Villaralbo. Judges came to complain “need for protection” girls who will be subjected to harassment and aggression they were between 12 and 16 years old.
The court then decided that he should keep the accused in jail. “avoid risk” something i can do violating the sexual freedoms of adolescentsthat’s what he’s talking about There are “reasonable, adequate and substantial indications” to conclude that he should remain in prison Until the hearing has been held and a penalty has been given, also to prevent them from escaping or interfering with the normal development of the oral hearing.
On this occasion, the complainants and their families have already denied that they can act for the following reasons: false interests, as the accused came to say. Like the investigating judge, it was denied annulment of the statements of the accused’s two daughters and six alleged victims. In the first case, as girls were informed of their right not to testify against their father; and in the second, because the complainants came with a lawyer to testify and did so in front of adults, as evidenced by the deposition records.
On this occasion, the complainants and their families have already denied that they can act for the following reasons: false interests, as the accused came to say. Like the investigating judge, it was denied annulment of the statements of the accused’s two daughters and six alleged victims. In the first case, as girls were informed of their right not to testify against their father; and in the second, because the complainants came with a lawyer to testify and did so in front of adults, as evidenced by the deposition records.
Source: Informacion
James Sean is a writer for “Social Bites”. He covers a wide range of topics, bringing the latest news and developments to his readers. With a keen sense of what’s important and a passion for writing, James delivers unique and insightful articles that keep his readers informed and engaged.