{

Recent video tests surfaced showing Atomic Heart running on several PC builds, including setups without a discrete graphics card. The demonstrations illustrate how the game performs across different processors and memory configurations, giving a practical snapshot for players considering budget or midrange rigs.

In the first showcase, performance is measured on Ryzen 3 3200G with Vega 8, Ryzen 5 3400G with Vega 11, and Athlon 3000G with Vega 3, all paired with 16 GB of DDR4 RAM clocked at 3200 MHz. The focus is on achieveable frame rates at various display targets while using medium visuals and an FSR emphasis on quality, which tends to maximize image fidelity without sacrificing too much speed.

Average figures from this round are as follows:

• Ryzen 3 3200G, medium graphics with FSR quality, 1080p – roughly 32 to 50 FPS.
• Ryzen 3 3200G, medium graphics with FSR quality, 900p – about 45 to 55 FPS.
• Ryzen 3 3200G, medium graphics with FSR quality, 720p – between 63 and 77 FPS.
• Ryzen 5 3400G, medium graphics with FSR quality, 1080p – around 52 to 60 FPS.
• Ryzen 3 3200G, low graphics with FSR performance mode, 720p – about 37 to 45 FPS.

A second test run examines a system with Ryzen 5 5600G (Vega 7) and 16 GB DDR4 3200 MHz RAM, offering a different balance of CPU power and graphics capability.

Notable results from this setup include:

• 1080p, low settings, standard rendering – about 32 to 37 FPS.
• 1080p, low settings with FSR balanced – roughly 53 to 63 FPS.
• 1080p, medium settings with FSR balanced – around 36 to 42 FPS.
• 900p, low settings with FSR balanced – 65 to 75 FPS.
• 900p, medium settings with FSR balanced – about 35 to 47 FPS.
• 720p, medium settings – 60 to 70 FPS.

There is also a Steam Deck test that highlights portability with portable hardware. The results show a mix of medium textures at locked frame rates around 28 to 30 FPS, and higher frames when using standard or quality-focused FSR modes, typically in the mid 30s to the low 50s FPS range.

Another clip evaluates a midrange desktop with Core i3 12100F, a budget NVIDIA GT 1030, and 16 GB DDR4 3200 MHz ram. The playthroughs show 1080p at low settings reaching 30 to 40 FPS, 1080p with medium visuals and FSR balanced yielding 40 to 60 FPS, and 900p with medium visuals plus FSR around 50 to 65 FPS.

The final test features a high-end build with an i9-9900K, 16 GB RAM at 3800 MHz, and an RTX 4090. Even at maximum graphics in 4K, frame rates stay comfortably above 85 FPS, underscoring the headroom a top-tier setup provides for demanding titles like Atomic Heart.

These tests echo past discussions on how graphics performance can differ between PC and console versions of Atomic Heart. The early impressions and the first review round are summarized in general analyses from gaming outlets, with broader context available through ongoing coverage of related titles such as Hogwarts Legacy and related platform differences. (VG Times, attribution).

In summary, Atomic Heart shows a broad range of performance depending on CPU, GPU, and display target. The variety of configurations tested indicates that players can expect playable framerates across a spectrum of budget and midrange systems, while enthusiasts with high-end hardware can enjoy smooth 4K gameplay at max settings. The key takeaway is that performance scales with both CPU power and the efficiency of upscaling methods like FSR, making it feasible to tailor visuals to personal preferences and hardware constraints. Citations to the observed tests provide a practical reference for future hardware purchases and gaming setups.

Source: VG Times