A popular YouTube review channel has tested the durability of two leading foldable smartphones, the Galaxy Z Flip 5 from Samsung and the Razr Plus from Motorola. The results are eye opening for buyers in both Canada and the United States who weigh long-term reliability in a device meant to bend with everyday use. The tests involved repeated folding and unfolding over several days to simulate real-world handling much more aggressively than typical consumer use.
In the channel’s latest update, the Samsung model endured more than 400,000 folding cycles before finally failing. The tester noted that the Galaxy Z Flip 5 withstood twice as many folds as its Motorola counterpart, underscoring a meaningful edge in battery of bend tests. The precise figure quoted for the Samsung device was 401,146 folds, measured over a testing window from early August. Viewers watched a live stream where testers continuously manipulated the phone in a fold-unfold rhythm to stress the hinge and display alignment.
For comparison, Motorola’s Razr Plus began at a high performance level but reached a notable limit sooner in the endurance run. The Razr Plus screen cracked during the testing at 126,266 cycles, a result that drew attention to the different hinge designs and material choices between the two devices. The testing team observed how the visual panel responded to repeated flexing, and the results were shared in an accessible, step-by-step fashion for viewers following the hardware stress test closely.
During the Samsung test, a hinge issue emerged around the 223,000-fold mark. Although the hinge remained operable and the phone could still be opened and closed, some software control aspects, including the screen turning off smoothly, were temporarily affected by the mechanical wear. This detail illustrates how mechanical wear can translate into user experience changes long before a complete functional failure occurs, a nuance that matters to potential buyers evaluating daily practicality and long-term reliability.
These endurance findings come amid ongoing consumer dialogue about foldables and how software updates and hardware choices influence overall longevity. The channel has previously highlighted broader considerations for Samsung devices in the foldable category and has shown interest in how these models stand up to extended real-world usage in everyday scenarios. The tests provide a tangible reference for users who want to understand how often they might expect a hinge or display issue to surface under heavy use. The methodology and results are presented in a straightforward manner to help viewers compare two prominent foldables without relying on marketing language alone.
For audiences in North America evaluating a high-usage foldable, the takeaway is clear: the Galaxy Z Flip 5 demonstrates remarkable resilience in the fold cycle test relative to the Razr Plus, though both devices exhibit signs of wear under extreme bending. Prospective buyers should consider how their own usage patterns, like frequent one-handed operation, quick clamshell actions, or multi-tasking on a single screen, align with the observed durability traits. Real-world outcomes will depend on how the device is treated day to day, including the frequency of folding, the environment, and the software features that manage display behavior during use. The test results contribute a pragmatic view to the ongoing conversation about which foldable best matches an individual’s lifestyle and expectations for long-term performance. The testing for these models is an important data point as more foldables enter the market and consumers demand transparency about build quality and durability. The broader message is that while both devices hold up well under many cycles, users should weigh hinge wear, screen response, and the potential for gradual performance changes when choosing a foldable for daily life. In the end, the numbers can guide but should be considered alongside personal experience with how a device feels and functions in real conditions. The testing team continues to document findings for those who want a detailed, unfiltered view of how foldables withstand extended use in everyday Canadian and American environments.